William F. Jung
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“The Court hereby GRANTS in part BSI's Motion to Dismiss. ... Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. ... In the absence of timely amendment, dismissal will be with prejudice without any further action of the Court.”
“The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion. Dkt. 5. The matter is remanded to the Circuit Court in and for Hillsborough County, Florida. The clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and close the file.”
“The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, GRANTS the Sheriff's motion, and GRANTS and DENIES in part the Town's motion.”
In this bankruptcy appeal, Judge Jung affirmed the ruling that the debtors' 2001 income-tax liability was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(1)(C). He held that excessive discretionary spending instead of paying taxes can satisfy the evasive-conduct element and that the statute does not permit partial discharge.
“After hearing argument of counsel, and after careful consideration and review of the submissions of the parties and the entire file, the Court grants summary judgment.”
“Based on the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment (Dkt. 76) is DENIED.”
“Upon careful consideration, the Court grants Seminole's Motion.”
“ENDORSED ORDER denying 57 Motion to Dismiss. The amended complaint withstands the low bar of notice pleading. The allegations are facially plausible and collectively "raise a right to relief above the speculative level."”
“Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. 22) is dismissed with prejudice.”
“ORDER denying 1 & 5 Motion to Vacate / Set Aside / Correct Sentence (2255). A certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied.”
“ORDER denying 1 Motion to Vacate / Set Aside / Correct Sentence (2255). No certificate of appealability is appropriate.”
“Based on the standard for dismissal, Defendant's motion must be denied.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
The reviewed Tampa matters, filed from 2021 through 2023 with additional 2026 cases, include a substantial criminal caseload and many civil False Claims Act cases. Those civil cases often remain sealed during lengthy intervention periods, making them poor measures of dispositive-motion timing; the sampled matters ended through voluntary or stipulated dismissals rather than contested dispositive rulings. This is descriptive context rather than a caseload-wide rate.
Put Judge Jung's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Jung actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Jung's own signed orders and cites them.