Wendy Williams Berger

How Judge Berger rules, drawn from 26 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Position
District judge
Appointed by
Donald J. Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
July 29, 2019
ABA rating
Qualified
Education
Florida State University, B.S., 1990; Florida State University College of Law, J.D., 1992
Signed orders read
26

About Judge Berger

Wendy Williams Berger has served as a United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida since July 29, 2019. Before her federal appointment, she served on Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal and Seventh Judicial Circuit. She earned a bachelor's degree and a law degree from Florida State University.

Judge Berger's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Berger, as published on the court's website (checked October 12, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Use at least 12-point Arial type, including indented quotations and footnotes, in pleadings and motions.

“shall be in at least 12-point Arial typeface, including all indented quotations, footnotes, and endnotes.”

Filing

All parties must certify at the end of every filing whether generative AI was used in drafting it.

“the undersigned requires all parties appearing before her, through counsel or pro se, to certify at the end of any filing:”

Filing

When AI drafted any language, the filer must certify human review for accuracy and verify cited authorities.

“language drafted by AI—even if later edited by a human—was personally reviewed by the filer or another human for accuracy and that all legal citations reference actual, non-fictitious cases or cited authority and accurately reflect the contents of such authority.”

Filing

A filing without the required AI certification may be stricken without substantive review or leave to amend.

“Filings that do not comply with this Order may be stricken without substantive consideration and without leave to amend.”

Filing

In criminal cases, the government must file a count-by-count notice of maximum penalty within fourteen days after the charge is docketed.

“In all criminal cases, the Government shall file a notice of maximum penalty as to each count charged in the charging document no later than fourteen days after the charge is docketed in the proceeding.”

Motions

A response to a summary judgment motion may be filed within thirty days after service.

“a party may respond to a motion for summary judgment within thirty days after service of the motion.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Berger decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In a selected detention case, the court ordered a bond hearing or release under the statutory detention framework.

“Within seven days of the date of this Order, Respondents shall”

In the trade secrets dispute, the court found a fee request premature to strike before the claimant had a chance to prove its statutory basis.

“Collins’s request is thus premature and will be denied.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Jonchuck v. Narjem
3:24-cv-00120-WWB · 2026-10-01
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 77) is GRANTED.”

Preminger v. Red Robin International, Inc.
3:25-cv-00772-WWB · 2026-09-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. 35) is DENIED as moot.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 40) is GRANTED.”

North Shore Marine Terminal and Logistics, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
3:25-cv-00944-WWB · 2026-09-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Lockheed’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 88) is GRANTED”

Simons v. Flightstar Aircraft Services, LLC
3:25-cv-01335-WWB · 2026-09-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 30) is GRANTED.”

Modaxo Traffic Management USA, Inc. v. Collins
3:25-cv-01463-WWB · 2026-09-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Collins’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 28) is DENIED.”

i3logix, Inc. v. Enhanced Voting LLC
3:26-cv-00315-WWB · 2026-09-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22) is GRANTED to the extent that the”

Motions to stay (defendant) Denied

“Reexaminations of the Asserted Patents (Doc. 45) is DENIED without”

Motion for leave to file reply (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Reply (Doc. 48) is DENIED.”

Alaniz v. Howard Law Group, P.A.
3:26-cv-00401-WWB · 2026-10-07
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 67) is DENIED.”

In re Kristen Adams
3:26-cv-01306-WWB · 2026-10-02
Motion to dismiss appeal (appellee) Granted

“Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal (Doc. 14) is GRANTED”

Cardoso v. Warden, North Florida Detention Facility
3:26-cv-02515-WWB · 2026-09-29
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted

“The Petition (Doc. 1) is GRANTED to the extent that Petitioner is entitled to”

Villegas Gutierrez v. Woodall
3:26-cv-00846-WWB · 2026-10-01
Habeas petition (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“The Amended Petition (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED as moot.”

Motions to dismiss (respondent) Moot / procedural

“The Warden’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is DENIED as moot.”

Villagomez-Nava v. Rhoden
3:26-cv-00850-WWB · 2026-10-01
Habeas petition (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“The Amended Petition (Doc. 8) is DISMISSED as moot.”

Vazquez Yanez v. Warden
3:26-cv-01213-WWB · 2026-10-02
Habeas petition (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“The Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Motions to dismiss (respondent) Denied

“The Warden’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

These selected matters illustrate the range of issues in the reviewed orders, not the composition of the judge's full docket.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, not for Judge Berger: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed6,8965.5 months
Closed with no court action493.5 months
Closed before pretrial6,4925.2 months
Closed during or after pretrial31914.7 months
Closed during trial3624.2 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20256,8965.5 months
Sep 20247,1155.6 months
Sep 20236,7775.5 months
Sep 20226,7816.7 months
Sep 20216,7496.2 months
Sep 20206,3926.2 months
Sep 20196,8305.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Berger with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Berger, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Berger's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace