Roy Bale Dalton Jr.
How Judge Dalton rules, drawn from 21 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
How Judge Dalton decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
In immigration-detention cases, he distinguishes between noncitizens seeking admission at the border under 8 U.S.C. § 1225 and those already present in the country under § 1226. When the government offers no lawful basis for detention under the applicable statute, he treats immediate release and tailored injunctive relief as available habeas remedies rather than requiring continued custody while awaiting a later hearing.
“In sum, this Court joins the many, many others to conclude that mandatory detention under § 1225 does not apply to noncitizens who are already present in this country.”
In Blaine, detailed medical-staff bylaws plausibly supplied a protected property interest and made the absence of the promised pre-termination process material to the physicians' due-process claim.
“A fundamental principle of procedural due process is that a person be given a pre-termination hearing prior to being deprived of any significant property interest.”
In Sotolongo, Dalton rejected a plea agreement when dismissal of the more serious counts would not reflect the alleged offense conduct and would constrain sentencing discretion.
“Given the nature and scope of the conspiracy alleged, if the Court were to permit dismissal of the more serious bank fraud and false statement charges, the remaining conspiracy charge would not adequately reflect the seriousness of the Sotolongo’s actual offense behavior.”
In Doe v. Rollins College, Dalton required school-specific circumstances connecting external pressure to asserted investigative disparities rather than treating public criticism alone as proof of gender bias.
“Alone, allegations of external pressure fail to support an inference of gender discrimination.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Defendant's Dispositive Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 12) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. The Motion (Doc. 12) is DENIED to the extent it seeks dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice. b. The Motion (Doc. 12) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of the Complaint without prejudice. ... The Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ... Plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint.”
“Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Coverage Issue (Doc. 87) is GRANTED to the extent identified in this Order. ... Because the Court concludes that the Policy does not obligate State Farm to hire pre-suit counsel for Ayers, State Farm's SJ Motion is due to be granted.”
“Plaintiff Frank Ayers' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 85) is DENIED.”
“Commodores Entertainment Corporation Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Complaint, First Amended Verified Answer and Counterclaim by Thomas McClary, and the First Amended Third Party Complaint (Doc. 411) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”
“Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 81) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. a. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Estates at Aloma Woods Homeowners Association, Inc. ... as to Count 6 of the Amended Complaint. b. In all other respects, the 12(c) Motion is denied.”
“Defendant Resurrection Life THC, Inc's Dispositive Motion for Final Summary Judgment with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 164) is GRANTED.”
“As to Defendant RLTHC, Plaintiff's Second Renewed and Amended Verified Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability and Defendants' Affirmative Defenses ... (Doc. 162) is DENIED.”
“Defendant Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53) is DENIED.”
“Defendant Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) is DENIED.”
“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. 45) is GRANTED.”
“Defendant[ ] Clean Fuels of Indiana, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Doc. 52) is DENIED.”
“Defendants moved for summary judgment on all claims (Doc. 115 (‘Motion’)), and Diamond opposed (Doc. 133). The Motion is due to be denied.”
“Both parties moved for summary judgment (Doc. 19 (‘Defendant's Motion’); Doc. 22 (‘Plaintiff's Motion’)), and each side responded and replied (Docs. 27-29). For the reasons set forth below, both motions are due to be denied.”
“Both parties moved for summary judgment (Doc. 19 (‘Defendant's Motion’); Doc. 22 (‘Plaintiff's Motion’)) ... For the reasons set forth below, both motions are due to be denied.”
“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts II-VII of Plaintiffs Complaint with Prejudice (Doc. 19) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART ... Counts Two through Seven of the Complaint (Doc. 1) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. On or before Friday, January 20, 2017, Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint.”
Draft for Judge Dalton with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Dalton, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Dalton's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace