Gregory J. Kelly

United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida magistrate 5 signed orders read

How Judge Kelly decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In benefits review, he requires specific reasons for the weight assigned to medical opinions; blanket inconsistency statements do not permit meaningful review.

“blanket statements or conclusions are not sufficient to support an ALJ’s decision.”

A nonparty subpoena directed at an individual did not reach employer records outside her possession, custody, or control.

“the Court finds that Jones is entitled to a protective order because it is undisputed that she does not have possession, custody, or control of the documents at issue.”

Procedural preferences

After granting discovery protection, he applies Rule 37 expense shifting unless the losing side establishes substantial justification or a conference failure.

“Plaintiffs have not demonstrated how their conduct ... is substantially justified.”

Cautions

An unexplained rejection of a treating or examining assessment cannot be rescued by a general reference to objective evidence or minimal daily activities.

“will always give good reasons in [their] ... decision for the weight [they] give [a] treating source's opinion.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Choquette v. Commissioner of Social Security
· 2010-02-18
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)”

Learning Connections, Inc. v. Kaufman, Englett & Lynd, PLLC
· 2012-02-23
Motion to quash or for protective order (nonparty) Granted

“Accordingly, the Motion (Doc. No. 77) is GRANTED.”

Learning Connections, Inc. v. Kaufman, Englett & Lynd, PLLC
· 2012-06-11
Motion for expenses (nonparty) Granted

“Accordingly, the Motion (Doc. No. 85) is GRANTED.”

Kahle v. Commissioner of Social Security
· 2012-02-10
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“REVERSE and REMAND the final decision of the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) because the decision is not supported by substantial evidence”

Rosario v. Commissioner of Social Security
· 2012-07-03
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of Section 405(g) for further proceedings”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The sampled consent docket is weighted toward Social Security review and also includes consumer-credit, insurance, and wage-and-hour matters.

Put Judge Kelly's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Kelly actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Kelly's own signed orders and cites them.