Douglas N. Frazier

How Judge Frazier rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Position
magistrate
Commissioned
2000-01-08
Education
United States Naval Academy, B.A., 1972; University of Mississippi, J.D., 1979
Signed orders read
7

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Bruet v. Barnhart
2:02-cv-00541 · 2004-03-31
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) denying her claim for Social Security disability benefits. For the reasons set out herein, the decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for an AWARD OF BENEFITS pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

McCullough v. Astrue
8:07-cv-00557 · 2008-07-02
Attorney fees eaja (plaintiff) Granted

“The Plaintiffs Petition for EAJA Fees (Doc. 35) is granted. The Court awards attorneys fees in the amount of $5,765.13, paralegal fees in the amount of $36.00, and costs in the amount of $2.25, for a total award of $5,803.38 which shall be made payable to the Plaintiffs attorney.”

Motion to supplement (plaintiff) Denied

“The Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement the Petition for EAJA Fees and Reply to Defendant’s Objections (Doc. 37) is denied.”

BONSANTO v. Astrue
6:09-cv-00366 · 2010-09-28
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case and thereafter, to close the file.”

Terry v. Astrue
6:07-cv-00513 · 2010-11-04
Attorney fees section 406b (plaintiff) Granted

“Counsel for the Plaintiff is awarded $2,498.12 in attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) which represents $13,849.25 minus the EAJA fees of $5,351.13 and minus the administrative fee of $6,000.”

Jenks v. Naples Community Hosp., Inc.
2:10-cv-197-FtM-DNF · 2011-11-07
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Defendants’ Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41) is hereby GRANTED as to Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 28).”

Lesti v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
2:11-cv-695-FtM-29DNF · 2014-03-26
Motions to compel (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“The Motion to Compel Wells Fargo Bank to Produce Information Relating to Co-Conspirator Angelika NeumeierFuchs in Response to Plaintiffs’ Document Requests and in Depositions (Doc. 160) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Gillett v. Colvin
6:15-cv-1720-Orl-DNF · 2017-02-22
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED AND REMANDED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment consistent with this opinion and, thereafter, to close the file.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 111 days (N = 23).

The sampled civil work is dominated by consent Social Security appeals under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), with attorney-fee petitions following successful remands.

Draft for Judge Frazier with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Frazier, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Frazier's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace