Douglas N. Frazier

How Judge Frazier rules, drawn from 11 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
January 8, 2000
Education
United States Naval Academy, B.A., 1972; University of Mississippi, J.D., 1979
Signed orders read
11

About Judge Frazier

Douglas N. Frazier began serving as a United States Magistrate Judge in the Fort Myers Division of the Middle District of Florida in January 2000 and later served on recall. A United States Naval Academy graduate, he served as a Marine Corps officer and as an Assistant United States Attorney before joining the bench.

Judge Frazier's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Frazier, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Motions

File dispositive and Daubert motions at least four months before the final pretrial meeting.

“The Court REQUIRES at least 4 months before the final pretrial meeting”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Bruet v. Barnhart
2:02-cv-00541 · 2004-03-31
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) denying her claim for Social Security disability benefits. For the reasons set out herein, the decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for an AWARD OF BENEFITS pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

McCullough v. Astrue
8:07-cv-00557 · 2008-07-02
Attorney fees eaja (plaintiff) Granted

“The Plaintiffs Petition for EAJA Fees (Doc. 35) is granted. The Court awards attorneys fees in the amount of $5,765.13, paralegal fees in the amount of $36.00, and costs in the amount of $2.25, for a total award of $5,803.38 which shall be made payable to the Plaintiffs attorney.”

Motion to supplement (plaintiff) Denied

“The Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement the Petition for EAJA Fees and Reply to Defendant’s Objections (Doc. 37) is denied.”

BONSANTO v. Astrue
6:09-cv-00366 · 2010-09-28
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case and thereafter, to close the file.”

Terry v. Astrue
6:07-cv-00513 · 2010-11-04
Attorney fees section 406b (plaintiff) Granted

“Counsel for the Plaintiff is awarded $2,498.12 in attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) which represents $13,849.25 minus the EAJA fees of $5,351.13 and minus the administrative fee of $6,000.”

Jenks v. Naples Community Hosp., Inc.
2:10-cv-197-FtM-DNF · 2011-11-07
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Defendants’ Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41) is hereby GRANTED as to Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 28).”

Lesti v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
2:11-cv-695-FtM-29DNF · 2014-03-26
Motions to compel (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“The Motion to Compel Wells Fargo Bank to Produce Information Relating to Co-Conspirator Angelika NeumeierFuchs in Response to Plaintiffs’ Document Requests and in Depositions (Doc. 160) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Gillett v. Colvin
6:15-cv-1720-Orl-DNF · 2017-02-22
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED AND REMANDED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment consistent with this opinion and, thereafter, to close the file.”

Bisson v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:24-cv-00488-DNF · 2025-04-11
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Reynolds v. Commissioner of Social Security
6:24-cv-00978-DNF · 2025-04-10
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security
5:24-cv-00275-DNF · 2024-09-30
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 16) is GRANTED.”

Wyatt v. Commissioner of Social Security
3:24-cv-00475-DNF · 2024-12-20
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 19) is GRANTED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 111 days (N = 27).

The sampled civil work is dominated by consent Social Security appeals under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), with attorney-fee petitions following successful remands.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, not for Judge Frazier: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed6,8965.5 months
Closed with no court action493.5 months
Closed before pretrial6,4925.2 months
Closed during or after pretrial31914.7 months
Closed during trial3624.2 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20256,8965.5 months
Sep 20247,1155.6 months
Sep 20236,7775.5 months
Sep 20226,7816.7 months
Sep 20216,7496.2 months
Sep 20206,3926.2 months
Sep 20196,8305.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Frazier with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Frazier, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Frazier's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace