Thomas E. Baynes Jr.

How Judge Baynes rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Baynes no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Deceased
Served
1987–2005
Commissioned
1987
Education
University of Georgia, bachelor's degree; Emory University, law degree; Yale University, law degree
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Baynes decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Foreign service must satisfy the applicable treaty and local service rules; mailing alone may not complete service.

“Accordingly, this Court finds that service by mail under Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention is insufficient in and of itself to constitute service abroad upon a defendant in Ontario, Canada.”

Cautions

A withholding adjustment alone did not establish intentional tax evasion without additional evidence of knowing and deliberate conduct.

“The Court’s own review of cases in this area revealed no instances where a Court found claiming too many exemptions on a W-4 is a sufficient act to establish a willful attempt to evade or defeat a tax absent other acts in either the bankruptcy or the tax case law.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Graffy
· 1998-01-16
Motion to dismiss chapter 13 case (Robert C. Graffy) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED the Debtor’s Motion to Dismiss Chapter 13 Case, No. 97-4978-8B3, be and the same is hereby granted with the specific condition that the Debtor is barred from filing any future bankruptcy case in any jurisdiction which seeks relief from any claim filed by the IRS concerning the Debtor’s tax obligations for a period of two years from the date this Order becomes final.”

Wargo v. United States (In re Wargo)
· 2005-03-18
Summary judgment (United States of America) Denied

“The Court rules the summary judgment motion shall be denied and enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law on the Debtors’ Complaint and the IRS’ Answer.”

Tax dischargeability claim (Edward M. Wargo and Linda Wargo) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED the Plaintiffs/Debtors taxes for the years 1982 through 1995 consecutively are dischargeable.”

Tax dischargeability claim (Edward M. Wargo and Linda Wargo) Denied

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED the Debtors taxes for the year 1996 are not dischargeable.”

Pert v. United States (In re Pert)
· 2000-05-23
Summary judgment (United States of America) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED the Court grants the Motion by the United States for Entry of Summary Judgment on Issue of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(C) and finds the Debtor’s personal tax liability, in the amount of $67,-672.00, is excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(C).”

Celotex Corp. v. Allstate Insurance (In re Celotex Corp.)
· 2003-02-10
Subrogation claim (Fibreboard Corporation) Denied

“Further, this Court finds that either under § 509 or a Florida theory of equitable subrogation, Fibreboard is not entitled to subrogation.”

In re Brose
· 1999-12-15
Motions to dismiss (Mary Ann Brose) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Emergency Motion to Dismiss Case with Prejudice or, Alternatively, for Abstention filed by Mary Ann Brose be, and the same is hereby, granted.”

Holway v. United States (In re Holway)
· 1999-08-06
Tax dischargeability claim (William A. Holway) Denied

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court finds in favor of the United States Government, holding the payment of the priority tax claim under the confirmed Chapter 13 plan did not extinguish the Government’s right to collect postpetition interest and penalties on the priority tax claim where the Debt- or/Plaintiff received only a Chapter 7 discharge.”

In re Wasp
· 1992-02-18
Motion for contempt and sanctions (Richard Wasp and Jacquelyn Wasp) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Debtors’ Amended Motion for Contempt and Sanctions for Violation of Discharge Order by Woodfield Community Association, Inc., is granted.”

O'Halloran v. Milehouse Investment Management Ltd. (In re Greater Ministries International, Inc.)
· 2002-08-21
Motion to quash service (Patrick Lett) Granted

“the Defendants’ Motion to Quash be, and same is hereby, granted as to Patrick Lett without prejudice to Trustee to properly serve Patrick Lett within twenty (20) days of the date of entry of this order.”

Motion to quash service (Milehouse Investment Management Ltd.) Denied

“the Defendants’ Motion To Quash be and the same is hereby denied as to Defendant Milehouse Investment Management Ltd. and they shall file their Responsive Pleadings within twenty (20) days.”

In re Ledin
· 1995-02-23
Objection to claim (Roy J. Ledin and Patricia Ann Ledin) Granted in part

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Debtors’ Objection to Claim of the United States of America be, and the same is hereby, sustained in part and overruled in part.”

In re Sargeant Farms, Inc.
· 1998-09-03
Joint motion to select mediator and appraiser (Sargeant Farms, Inc. and United States of America) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Robert Stokes, Esq., be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as the Mediator, in accordance with Rule 9019-2 of the Local Rules of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida.”

In re Celotex Corp.
· 1998-09-24
Motion to determine claim ownership (Debt Acquisition Company of America II, L.P. and Debt Acquisition Company of America IV, L.P.) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED the Motion to Determine Ownership of Certain Transferred Claims by DACA be, and the same is hereby, granted and News-tart Factors, Inc. is deemed the owner of the following claims: (1) Johnstown Communications — Original Claim No. S435419; (2) Packard’s — Original Claim No. S585450; and (3) Redwing Carrier, Inc. — Original Claim No. 3239.”

Motion to exclude affidavits (Debt Acquisition Company of America II, L.P. and Debt Acquisition Company of America IV, L.P.) Moot / procedural

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED DACA’s Motion to Exclude Affidavits Filed in Connection with Motion to Determine Ownership of Certain Transferred Claims be and the same is hereby denied as moot.”

America Online, Inc. v. Uhrig (In re Uhrig)
· 2004-02-26
Motions to dismiss (Daniel Uhrig) Denied

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED Debtor’s Motion to Dismiss For Failure to State a Cause of Action Count I Section 523 be, and the same is hereby, denied.”

Motion for sanctions (Daniel Uhrig) Denied

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED both Debtor’s First and Second Motions for Sanctions Against America Online, Inc., be, and same are hereby, denied.”

Motion for sanctions (Daniel Uhrig) Denied
Summary judgment (Daniel Uhrig) Denied

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED Debtor’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count II Section 727 be, and the same is hereby, denied.”

Summary judgment (America Online, Inc.) Granted

“ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED American Online, Inc.’s Motion and Memorandum of Law for Partial Summary Judgment be, and the same is hereby, granted.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Five sampled terminated matters contained no docket entries, so no caseload mix or case-duration summary is available.

A historical record

Judge Baynes no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.