Michael G. Williamson

How Judge Williamson rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Williamson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Deceased
Served
2000–2022
Commissioned
2000-03-01
Education
Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., 1976
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Williamson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Detailed fee applications and approval are required even when a professional seeks only to retain a prepetition payment.

“even a professional seeking nothing more than to keep a pre-petition retainer as full compensation must comply with the requirement under section 330 and Rule 2016(a) to file a detailed fee application and obtain court approval.”

Cautions

Requests for a second opportunity to offer evidence threaten finality and can produce endless litigation.

“This Court concludes that granting the Motion to Defer would undoubtedly invite an endless series of ‘do-over’ requests for matters that have already been afforded their full due process of law under the Bankruptcy Code and Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Walton v. Clark & Washington, P.C.
· 2012-05-21
Motion to determine fee procedure compliance (United States Trustee) Granted in part

“For the reasons discussed below, the Court determines that, with certain modifications, this new practice is acceptable and does not conflict with the Court’s previous ruling.”

In re Collman & Karsky Architects, Inc.
· 2011-12-13
Motion for adequate protection or stay relief (Colwill Engineering, Inc.) Denied

“To the extent it seeks adequate protection or relief from the automatic stay, Colwill’s Motion is hereby DENIED.”

In re Anson
· 2011-09-30
Objection to claim (debtors) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court sustains the Debtors’ objection and reduces Liberty’s claim to the amount of the deficiency: $62,012.05.”

In re Moseley
· 2012-04-20
Motion to extend deadline to object to discharge (ARC Pool 1, LLC) Granted

“So the Court will grant ARC’s Motion to the extent it seeks to extend the deadline for objecting to the Debtor’s discharge.”

Motion to extend deadline for dischargeability action (ARC Pool 1, LLC) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, the Court has no choice but to deny ARC’s Motion to the extent it seeks to extend the deadline for filing a dischargeability action.”

In re Johnson
· 2011-07-08
Summary judgment (United States Trustee) Denied

“The U.S. Trustee’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

Lindros v. United States (In re Lindros)
· 2011-11-02
Tax dischargeability claim (Michael Carl Lindros) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court will enter final judgment in favor of Lindros on Count I of his adversary complaint.”

In re Murray
· 2010-12-06
Motion for rehearing (creditor holding charging lien) Granted

“The Motion for Rehearing is GRANTED.”

Motion to avoid judgment lien (debtor) Denied

“The Lien Avoidance Motion is DENIED.”

Von Kahle v. Greenacre Properties, Inc. (In re Key Developers Group, LLC)
· 2011-04-15
Summary judgment (Greenacre Properties, Inc.) Granted

“A separate order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment”

Summary judgment (liquidating trustee) Denied

“and denying Trustee’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment”

Summary judgment (liquidating trustee) Denied

“and Trustee’s Supplemental Cross Motion for Summary Judgment”

In re Safety Harbor Resort and Spa
· 2011-08-30
Objection to plan lockup provisions (debtor) Denied

“Accordingly, the objection based on Stem will be overruled.”

Meininger v. Florida Pediatric Associates, LLC (In re Johnson)
· 2011-07-13
Motion to strike punitive damages (Florida Pediatric Associates, LLC) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court will enter a separate order granting the Defendant’s Motion to Strike Prayer for Punitive Damages.”

Bate v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Bate)
· 2011-06-22
Motions to dismiss (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) Denied

“For the above reasons, this Court concludes that Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss shall be denied by separate order.”

In re Dowell
· 2011-09-22
Motion for reconsideration (debtor) Granted in part

“The Debtor’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 18) is GRANTED in part to the extent set forth in this Order.”

Objection to exemptions (chapter 7 trustee) Granted in part

“The Trustee’s Objection (Doc. No. 12) is SUSTAINED in part as to the Vehi-ele, and OVERRULED in part as to the spinner device alone.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Five sampled terminated matters contained no docket entries, so no caseload mix or case-duration summary is available.

A historical record

Judge Williamson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.