Luis E. Rivera II

How Judge Rivera rules, drawn from 8 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
October 2, 2025
Education
Loyola University New Orleans, B.A. in political science magna cum laude; Washington and Lee University School of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
8

About Judge Rivera

Luis E. Rivera II was sworn in as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Middle District of Florida in October 2025. He sits in Tampa and also handles matters from the Fort Myers Division. Before joining the court, he practiced bankruptcy law and served as a Chapter 7 panel trustee.

Judge Rivera's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Rivera, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Conferences

During the Fort Myers courthouse construction, Judge Rivera holds all non-evidentiary Fort Myers hearings by Zoom.

“Until further notice after conclusion of construction, the Court will hold all non-evidentiary hearings (including Chapter 13 confirmation hearings) by Zoom.”

Trial

Trials and evidentiary hearings before Judge Rivera are in person unless the court orders otherwise.

“Unless the Court specifically orders otherwise, the Court will conduct all trials and evidentiary hearings in person.”

How Judge Rivera decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In the Medicare context, the payment-and-adjustment system was treated as one integrated transaction for recoupment purposes.

“this system of payments and later adjustments must be viewed as a single, integrated transaction for recoupment in bankruptcy.”

Procedural preferences

Discovery can be limited when customer burden and harm to a reorganization outweigh the incremental benefit of information available from less burdensome sources.

“the potential prejudice to the Debtors’ prospects of reorganization outweighs the likely benefit of discovery from the Debtors’ customers”

Cautions

A nominal management change does not establish independence; the court examines whether the new manager is genuinely separate from prior control.

“We must be cautious of efforts to create the appearance of new management independence without its reality.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re American Tool & Mold, Inc.
8:26-bk-04159-LER · 2026-07-07
Motion for protective order (American Tool & Mold, Inc. and affiliated debtors) Granted in part

“Thus, the Court granted in part the Motion for Protective Order by limiting the temporal scope of the discovery and quashing the discovery requests made to Debtors’ customers.”

In re American Tool & Mold, Inc.
8:26-bk-04159-LER · 2026-07-02
Application to employ independent director (American Tool & Mold, Inc. and affiliated debtors) Granted

“The Debtors’ Emergency Application to Employ Oscher Consulting, PLLC as Independent Director is APPROVED as set forth herein.”

Objection to application to employ independent director (EverBank, N.A.) Denied

“The Court will overrule the objections and approve the appointment of Lisl Unterholzner and Oscher Consulting, PLLC”

Objection to application to employ independent director (United States Trustee) Denied
In re IHN Podiatry Services, PLLC
8:26-bk-00384-LER · 2026-04-06
Motion to enforce automatic stay (IHN Podiatry Services, PLLC) Granted in part

“The Debtor’s Emergency Motion to Enforce the Automatic Stay is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

In re Skubinski
2:26-bk-00277-FMR · 2026-02-13
Motion for relief from automatic stay (J.G. Properties, LLC) Granted

“the Expedited Motion to Lift Automatic Stay (Doc. No. 10) filed by Creditor J.G. Properties, LLC, is GRANTED.”

Request for in rem relief (J.G. Properties, LLC) Denied

“The request for in rem relief as against the Premises under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(4) is denied without prejudice.”

In re Parsons
2:25-bk-02246-FMR · 2026-01-14
Motion for order confirming no automatic stay (Marife J. Changco) Denied

“The Notice of Domestic Relations Exception, which the Court construes as a motion for an order confirming no automatic stay is in effect, is DENIED.”

In re Lawrence Souza, Jr.
2:26-bk-00352-FMR · 2026-08-29
Summary judgment (Lawrence Souza, Jr.) Granted

“The Debtor’s Motion For Summary Judgment on U.S. Bank’s Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED.”

Motion for relief from automatic stay (U.S. Bank) Denied

“U.S. Bank’s Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay and Co-Debtor Stay (Doc. No. 17) is DENIED.”

Parsons v. Changco and Chernoff (In re Vernon Ballard Parsons III)
2:25-ap-00078-FMR · 2026-08-29
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Holly Beth Chernoff) Granted in part

“The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

In re J.L.E.T. Enterprises, LLC
8:26-bk-00405-LER · 2026-08-28
Motion to assume unexpired lease (J.L.E.T. Enterprises, LLC) Granted

“Interim and Final Basis is GRANTED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The sample includes individual and corporate Chapter 7 cases, ordinary Chapter 11 cases, Subchapter V reorganizations, and a jointly administered large Chapter 11 proceeding.

Draft for Judge Rivera with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Rivera, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Rivera's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace