Jessie R. Benavides

How Judge Benavides rules, drawn from 5 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
Delaware Court of Chancery
Position
State court judge
Commissioned
September 22, 2025
Education
McGill University (B.A.); Temple University, Beasley School of Law (J.D.)
Signed orders read
5

About Judge Benavides

Jessie R. Benavides has served as a Magistrate in Chancery on the Delaware Court of Chancery since September 2025. She previously practiced family, estate, guardianship, and other civil law. She earned her undergraduate degree at McGill University and her law degree at Temple University.

Judge Benavides's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Benavides's own (checked October 11, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Benavides decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In a life-estate waste dispute, she gives a party who has fallen behind on a recurring financial obligation a final, time-limited chance to cure before granting the harsher remedy sought, where the party's testimony about the ability to pay is credible.

“Defendant has represented credibly that he has the ability and financial means to bring the mortgage current and continue to pay it. Equity requires that Defendant be allowed a limited period of time to remedy the mortgage situation before the Court entering an order terminating his life estate.”

Procedural preferences

In Sykes v. Mackay, Benavides declined to consider new dismissal arguments first raised at oral argument because the motion and responsive pleadings had not given the opposing party notice of them.

“because these arguments were not addressed in the Motion and the Responsive Pleadings, the Court will not take any of these arguments into consideration;”

Cautions

In Gray, Benavides found that a murderer could not inherit the victim’s property interest under Delaware’s slayer statute, while retaining his own existing share as a joint tenant.

“Only the slayer’s succession in the decedent’s property interest is affected and consequently voided.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Clifton Sykes v. Wayne J. Mackay and Joanne Mackay
C.A. No. 2025-0724-JRB · 2026-04-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on grounds of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is DENIED.”

Venera Casson, Dannique Casson, and Clarence Adams v. Cary Norris
C.A. No. 2026-0103-JRB · 2026-05-07
Petition for equitable relief (petitioner) Granted in part

“The Petition should be GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS. ... Should Defendant fail to bring the mortgage current and fail to file proof he has brought the mortgage current, the Petition should be GRANTED and his life estate terminated.”

Danel v. Reinhardt
C.A. No. 2024-0247-JRB · 2026-02-04
Motions to compel (petitioner) Granted

“For the reasons explained above, I grant the Petitioner’s Motion to Compel and grant the Petitioner’s Motion for a Protective Order.”

Motion for protective order (petitioner) Granted
Billings v. Hickory Hollow Homeowners Association
C.A. No. 2025-1265-JRB · 2026-02-20
Motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (petitioner) Denied

“For the reasons explained above, I deny the Petitioner’s Motion for TRO/PI and grant Respondents’ request for the Authority to Act through a status quo order.”

Request for authority to act (respondent) Granted
Gray v. Reynolds III
C.A. No. 2026-0118-JRB · 2026-06-02
Petition for confirmation of ownership (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons explained above, I recommend denying Plaintiff’s Complaint for Confirmation of Ownership of the Subject Property and recommend finding that Plaintiff does not have an ownership interest in the Subject Property.”

Draft for Judge Benavides with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Benavides, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Benavides's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace