Karen B. Owens

How Judge Owens rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
June 17, 2019
Signed orders read
22

About Judge Owens

Karen B. Owens is Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Delaware. She joined the court in June 2019 and hears cases in Wilmington.

Judge Owens's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Owens, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Conferences

Except for first-day hearings, register for remote attendance by 4 p.m. Eastern on the business day before the proceeding.

“With the exception of first-day hearings, the deadline to register for remote attendance is 4:00 p.m. (Eastern time) the business day before the proceeding unless otherwise noticed.”

Conferences

Register for remote attendance at first-day hearings at least one hour before the hearing unless another deadline is noticed.

“The deadline to register for remote attendance at first-day hearings is one-hour prior to the hearing unless otherwise noticed.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Owens decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Cautions

Voluntarily dismissing and refiling substantially similar claims in another venue can support a costs award when it produces needless duplicate work.

“The behavior is not in good faith as Plaintiffs’ urge this Court to find. It is forum shopping and vexatious.”

The court denied stay relief for a requested setoff when the asserted penalty remained unresolved through the tariff dispute process and was not final under applicable New York law.

“Under these facts, the Penalty is not final, and New York law does not permit it to be set off against the Unpaid Revenue.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

FTX Recovery Trust v. Patel
24-50216 · 2025-10-27
Motions to dismiss (Neil Patel and affiliated defendants) Granted in part

“Counts V and VI with respect to the Big Deal Transfer and Earned Media Transfer are DISMISSED. The remainder of the relief requested in the Motion is DENIED.”

FTX Recovery Trust v. Farmington State Corporation
24-50197 · 2025-11-25

This order was superseded by an amended December 2, 2025 order clarifying that dismissal was without prejudice.

FTX Recovery Trust v. Farmington State Corporation
24-50197 · 2025-12-02
Motions to dismiss (Farmington State Corporation and related defendants) Granted

“the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Motions to stay (Farmington State Corporation and related defendants) Moot / procedural

“the relief requested in the Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot.”

FTX Recovery Trust v. The Goodly Institute
24-50212 · 2026-02-27
Motions to dismiss (The Goodly Institute) Granted in part

“Count 6 is dismissed without prejudice. If the Trust wishes to amend, the Trust may file a motion seeking leave to do so pursuant to Federal Rule 15 within thirty (30) days of this Memorandum Order. The remainder of the relief requested in the Motion to Dismiss is denied.”

FTX Recovery Trust v. Farmington State Corporation
24-50197 · 2026-03-06
Motion to amend complaint (FTX Recovery Trust) Granted in part

“the Motion is granted with respect to Counts I and III of the SAC. The remainder of the relief requested in the Motion is denied.”

LB NewHoldco, LLC v. Trive Capital Management, LLC
25-50965 · 2026-03-30
Motions to dismiss (Trive defendants) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby concludes and orders that: 1. Counts IV and V are dismissed. 2. Counts VII and VIII are dismissed with respect to defendants Trive and Damani. 3. All remaining relief requested in the Motions is denied.”

Motions to dismiss (Shafik Kassam) Granted in part
Motions to dismiss (management defendants) Granted in part
Motions to dismiss (Anil Damani and affiliated defendants) Granted in part
Tang v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd.
24-50020 · 2026-04-29
Rule 41d motion for costs (overlapping defendants) Granted

“the Court hereby grants the Rule 41(d) Motion”

In re Hudson 1701/1706, LLC
25-11853 · 2026-05-28
Motion to certify direct appeal (ground lessor) Granted

“the Section 365 Order is certified for direct appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit”

Medley LLC Liquidating Trust v. Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
23-50121 · 2026-07-01
Summary judgment (Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP) Denied

“Eversheds’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

FTX Recovery Trust v. Binance Holdings Limited
24-50222 · 2026-07-24
Motion to dismiss or compel arbitration (Digital Anchor Holdings Limited) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated above, the following is hereby ORDERED: 1. Counts I through V of the Complaint against Defendants Lim and Xiao are dismissed. 2. Counts VI through IX of the Complaint against the Binance Defendants are dismissed. 3. The remainder of the relief requested in the Motions is denied.”

Motions to dismiss (Binance corporate defendants) Granted in part
Motions to dismiss (Samuel Wenjun Lim) Granted in part
Motions to dismiss (Dinghua Xiao) Granted in part
Motions to dismiss (Changpeng Zhao) Granted in part
In re Danskammer Holdco LLC
26-10950 · 2026-10-01
Motion for relief from stay (New York Independent System Operator, Inc.) Denied

“For the forgoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.”

FTX Recovery Trust v. Genesis Block Ltd.
24-50185 · 2025-05-27
Motion to sever and related relief (Leslie Tam) Moot / procedural

“the relief requested in the Motion is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Four terminated sampled matters lasted from 36 to 622 days, with a median of 309 days. The sample is descriptive and is not a complete caseload census.

Draft for Judge Owens with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Owens, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Owens's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace