Craig T. Goldblatt

How Judge Goldblatt rules, drawn from 114 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
2021
Education
Georgetown University (B.A., 1990); University of Chicago Law School (J.D., 1993)
Signed orders read
114

About Judge Goldblatt

Craig T. Goldblatt has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Delaware since 2021. Before joining the bench, he practiced bankruptcy litigation and appeals. He earned a law degree from the University of Chicago Law School.

Judge Goldblatt's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Goldblatt, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Conferences

Live witnesses may appear remotely only upon a showing of good cause and compelling circumstances.

“The remote attendance of live witnesses is permitted only upon a showing of good cause and in compelling circumstances.”

Conferences

For remote attendance outside first-day hearings, register by 4 p.m. Eastern the business day before the proceeding.

“With the exception of first-day hearings, the deadline to register for remote attendance is 4:00 p.m. (Eastern time) the business day before the proceeding unless otherwise noticed.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Goldblatt decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Cautions

In a judgment-enforcement dispute, he denied a motion to compel without prejudice because the parties had not completed a good faith conference about the discovery requests.

“the Court requires the parties to make a good faith effort to confer in order to try to narrow their differences and/or sharpen the disputes that the Court is being called upon to resolve.”

In Hoover v. Drivetrain, he denied a motion to strike a WARN Act affirmative defense because the employees relied on discovery evidence beyond the pleadings, leaving them free to seek partial summary judgment.

“The reason the motion to strike fails, however, is that it relies on material outside the pleadings.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Joann Inc. v. Advantus Corp.
25-51022 · 2026-06-11
Judgment on the pleadings (wind-down debtors) Denied

“the Wind-Down Debtors’ motion for judgment on the pleadings will be denied; the vendors’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction will be denied; the former officers’ motion to strike the vendors’ joinder in the Wind-Down Debtors’ motion for judgment on the pleadings will be denied; the vendors’ motion to remand will be denied; the vendors’ motion for abstention will be denied; and the vendors’ motion for a stay pending resolution of the Enforcement Action will be denied as moot.”

Motions to dismiss (vendors) Denied
Motions to strike (former officers) Denied
Motions to remand (vendors) Denied
Motion to abstain (vendors) Denied
Motions to stay (vendors) Moot / procedural
Jackson Square Advisors, LLC v. Bonita
25-52431 · 2026-06-30
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“the motion to dismiss will be granted without prejudice to the trustee’s right to seek leave to amend (and the defendants’ right to oppose a motion for leave) within 30 days of the issuance of the order dismissing the complaint.”

Miller v. Foley & Lardner, LLP
26-50207 · 2026-07-09
Motion to abstain (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the Court will deny the trustee’s motion to abstain and remand.”

Motions to remand (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied
Roberts v. Green Convergence
25-52473 · 2026-07-23
Motions to dismiss (Green Convergence) Granted in part

“Counts II and III of each of those complaints will accordingly be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. For the reasons described above, the motion to dismiss Count I will be denied.”

Motions to dismiss (Solar Tech Energy Systems, Inc.) Granted in part
In re Deqser, LLC
25-10687 · 2026-08-21
Motion to compel payment under section 365 d 5 (Hub Truck Rental Corp.) Granted

“therefore pay that amount to Hub within 10 days of the entry of the order resolving”

Drivetrain, LLC v. Rogas
24-50180 · 2026-08-11
Summary judgment (Cyber Litigation trustee) Granted in part

“the trustee’s motion for summary judgment on this claim will be granted in part and denied in part.”

Miller v. Mott
23-50004 · 2026-07-27
Motion to recuse (individual defendants) Denied

“the motion to recuse will be denied.”

In re Deqser, LLC
25-10687 · 2026-10-02
Motion to compel payment under section 365 d 5 (Hub Truck Rental Corp.) Granted

“Based on the record before the Court, that amount is $184,099.46. The debtors must therefore pay that amount to Hub within 10 days”

In re Simply Interior Homes, LLC
26-10922 · 2026-09-22

The memorandum explains why the confirmed liquidating plan can preserve estate causes of action for a post-confirmation trust while retaining related-to jurisdiction. It discusses an already-issued confirmation order rather than deciding a motion in this document.

In re Yellow Corporation
23-11069 · 2026-04-02
Motion to approve settlements (debtors) Granted in part

“the debtors’ motion seeking approval of the proposed settlements with the various pension plans other than the New York Teamsters, Local 617, and Local 1730 will be granted. The motion seeking approval of the proposed settlements with the New York Teamsters, Local 617, and Local 1730 will be denied.”

Barlow v. Hooper
25-51040 · 2026-04-06

The court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, leaving the defendants' merits arguments unaddressed.

Lighthouse Resources Inc. v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Co.
24-50144 · 2026-05-05
Summary judgment (Lighthouse Resources Inc.) Granted

“the motion for partial summary judgment as to liability will be granted.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Three terminated sampled matters lasted from 210 to 998 days, with a median of 361 days. The sample is descriptive and is not a complete caseload census.

Draft for Judge Goldblatt with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Goldblatt, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Goldblatt's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace