Walter Irving McCoy

How Judge McCoy rules, drawn from 5 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge McCoy no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (now U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia)
Position
district
Status
Retired 1929
Served
1914–1929
Appointed by
Woodrow Wilson (Democratic)
Commissioned
1914-10-02
Education
Harvard University, A.B., 1882; Harvard University, A.M., 1886; Harvard Law School, LL.B., 1886
Signed orders read
5

How Judge McCoy decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He accepted long, consistently safe use of a non-obviously-dangerous design as evidence supporting reasonable care.

“as a general rule when an appliance or structure not obviously dangerous has been in daily use for years, and has uniformly proved adequate and safe, its use may be continued without the imputation of culpable imprudence or carelessness.”

He took judicial notice that ergonomically shaped tool handles were old and varied when assessing claimed patent novelty.

“The court will take judicial notice of the fact that tool handles designed to fit the hands are very old and of infinite variety”

Cautions

He held a plaintiff to the statutory-bond theory expressly pleaded rather than recasting the instrument as a voluntary bond.

“the declaration counts specifically upon a statutory bond.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Minor
· 1917-01-02
Patent appeal (patent applicant) Denied

“The decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents is affirmed.”

Kane v. Podlesak
· 1918-05-06
Patent appeal (patent applicant) Denied

“The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. Affirmed.”

In re Martin
· 1918-12-02
Patent appeal (patent applicant) Granted

“The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is reversed, and the clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required.”

Jackson v. District of Columbia
· 1919-03-03
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.”

United States v. Faircloth
· 1920-04-05
Appeal (United States) Denied

“The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.”

A historical record

Judge McCoy no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.