Spottswood William Robinson III

How Judge Robinson rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Robinson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1964–1998
Appointed by
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
Commissioned
1964-07-02
Education
Howard University School of Law, LL.B. (1939)
Signed orders read
7

How Judge Robinson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Carl Zeiss, Robinson required more than a request to verify an executive's description of protected material before ordering further judicial inspection.

“The necessity the moving party must show is considerably more than a demand that someone other than his adversary look at the materials in question to make certain that statements as to their character are accurate.”

In Hoffa, Robinson disqualified shared counsel because a union seeking restoration of funds could become directly adverse to the accused officer that counsel also represented.

“In that event the interests of the International and the officer would become seriously adverse, and the responsibilities of counsel irreconciliably conflicting”

Procedural preferences

In Trailways, Robinson confined judicial review to statutory authority, adequate findings, and substantial evidence rather than reweighing the agency's competing factual conclusions.

“Our function is limited to determining whether the Commission’s order is within the range of its statutory authority and is predicated upon adequate findings supported by substantial evidence.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Trailways of New England, Inc. v. United States
No. 1711-64 · 1964-10-02
Request for injunctive relief (plaintiff bus companies) Denied

“For these reasons, the injunctive relief sought will be denied and the action will be dismissed.”

Brown v. Potomac Electric Power Company
Civ. A. 2486-60 · 1964-06-15

After trial, Robinson found no negligent act by the electric utility and no substantial physical injury supporting the claimed emotional-distress damages. No party motion is classified from the trial judgment.

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Civ. A. 1641-64 · 1964-10-23
Petition to impeach arbitration award (plaintiff Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen) Denied

“For the reasons discussed herein, judgment will be entered in favor of the defendants.”

Irby v. United States
Civ. A. No. 668-65 · 1965-12-24
Motion under 28 usc 2255 (petitioner Irby) Denied

“The policy of lenity has no room for operation in this case, and the motion must be denied.”

Altman v. Central of Georgia Railway Company
Civ. A. 547-65 · 1965-09-29
Motion for leave to join party (plaintiffs) Denied

“Since the complaint provides no basis for the action the motion seeks, the motion will be denied.”

Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“and it must be dismissed.”

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Hoffa
Civ. A. 1154-64 · 1965-05-14
Motion to drop parties (International Brotherhood of Teamsters) Granted

“The motion will be granted.”

Motion to intervene (International Brotherhood of Teamsters) Denied

“The International’s motion that it be dropped as a plaintiff and permitted to intervene as a defendant will be denied without prejudice to renewal by independent counsel appearing in its behalf.”

Motion to disqualify counsel (trustees ad litem) Granted

“The motion of the trustees ad litem for disqualification will be granted and the International’s proposed answer in intervention rejected.”

Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena
Misc. No. 22-65 · 1966-05-18
Motion to modify subpoena (United States) Granted

“The Government’s motion for modification will be granted.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No exact-name federal docket records were returned for Robinson's 1964–1966 district tenure, so no historical caseload mix is reported.

A historical record

Judge Robinson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.