Robert Leon Wilkins

How Judge Wilkins rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Wilkins no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Position
district
Status
Retired 2014
Served
2010–2014
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2010-12-27
Education
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (B.S., Chemical Engineering, cum laude, 1986); Harvard Law School (J.D., 1989)
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Wilkins decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In administrative-record litigation, he requires clear evidence that an agency omitted material it actually considered; possession or an indirect reference alone does not overcome the presumption that the record was properly compiled.

“The law provides a presumption that an agency properly compiled the Administrative Record that may be rebutted only upon ‘clear evidence to the contrary.’”

Procedural preferences

He enforced local filing deadlines for costs even after a post-trial motion, reasoning that a later filing could not revive a deadline that had already expired.

“there was no viable time period left to toll”

Cautions

A motion to reconsider must identify new law, new evidence, clear error, or manifest injustice; disagreement or an attempt to reargue the original motion is insufficient.

“Mere disagreement is not sufficient to prevail on a Rule 59(e) motion.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Banks v. District of Columbia
· 2011-09-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted
Lindsey v. U.S. Parole Commission
1:13-cv-00550 · 2013-08-20
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Hence, the petition will be denied and this case will be dismissed.”

Hinton v. Dial Corporation
1:12-cv-01131 · 2013-01-23
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Hence, for reasons of comity and judicial economy, the Court will grant defendant’s motion and will dismiss this case without prejudice.”

Edwards v. District of Columbia
1:09-cv-01053 · 2013-09-06
Motion for extension of time (plaintiff) Denied

“For these reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 47) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate (Dkt. No. 48) are DENIED.”

Motion to reinstate (plaintiff) Denied
Johnson-Parks v. D.C. Chartered Health Plan
1:09-cv-01492 · 2013-04-05
Motion to clarify (defendant) Granted in part

“Therefore, the Defendant’s Motion to Clarify (Dkt. No. 50) is GRANTED as to these grounds. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED.”

Shaw v. OneWest Bank, FSB
1:13-cv-01526 · 2014-01-13
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to stay is DENIED.”

United States ex rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corporation
1:10-cv-00976 · 2014-01-02
Motions to strike (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Strike is hereby GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Conditional Motion to Amend is STRICKEN from the record.”

Conditional motion to amend (relator) Moot / procedural
Wilson v. Porreco
1:11-cv-01113 · 2013-09-13
Motion to retax costs (plaintiff) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Wilson’s Motion to Retax, denying the imposition of any costs against Wilson under Federal Rule 54 and Local Civil Rule 54.1.”

United States v. Malik
1:12-cv-01234 · 2013-10-02
Motion to alter or amend judgment (defendant) Denied

“For these reasons, Defendants’ motion is hereby denied.”

Nichols v. Office of General Counsel
1:11-cv-01357 · 2013-09-25
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Court finds that ATF conducted an adequate search for responsive records and is now entitled to summary judgment.”

Harvey v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia
1:12-cv-01630 · 2013-05-03
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant respondent’s motion to dismiss this habeas action as moot.”

Concesionaria Dominicana de Autopistas y Carreteras, S.A. v. Dominican State
1:12-cv-01335 · 2013-02-22
Motion for attorney fees (petitioner) Granted

“the Court will therefore grant CODACSA’s request and award $291,312.57 in attorneys’ fees and $33,620.19 in costs that CODACSA incurred in connection with this litigation.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The exact-name search returned twenty matters filed in 2013, including Social Security, personal injury, contract, information-access, habeas, immigration, bankruptcy-appeal, labor, and False Claims Act cases. This is a visible archive slice, not a complete caseload count.

A historical record

Judge Wilkins no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.