Moxila A. Upadhyaya

How Judge Upadhyaya rules, drawn from 27 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
September 7, 2022
Education
University of Missouri, Bachelor of Journalism, magna cum laude; University of Missouri, B.A. in Latin, with honors; American University Washington College of Law, J.D., cum laude
Signed orders read
27

About Judge Upadhyaya

Moxila A. Upadhyaya has served as a United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Columbia since September 2022. She earned degrees from the University of Missouri and American University, clerked for Judges Eric T. Washington and Robert L. Wilkins, and practiced commercial and administrative litigation before joining the court.

Judge Upadhyaya's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Upadhyaya's own (checked October 8, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Carrigg v. Gallaudet University
· 2022-10-18
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Carrigg’s Motion to file a Second Amended Complaint”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“DENIES Gallaudet’s Motion to Dismiss without prejudice.”

Gibbs v. Kijakazi
· 2023-06-07
Motion for remand (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS the Commissioner’s Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand.”

Motion for judgment of reversal (claimant) Moot / procedural

“the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal.”

Coleman v. McAleenan
· 2022-12-01
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.”

Stanton v. Whitley
· 2022-11-14
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS the Corps’ motion for summary judgment, ECF 9.”

Kight v. Crunchy Tobacco, Inc.
· 2024-02-14
Motion for attorney fees (defendant) Granted in part

“Crunchy’s Petition for Attorneys’ Fees is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Cabrera v. Mogoo, Inc.
· 2024-03-21
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Denied

“the Court DENIES Defendant ENB’s Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 96.”

Lapotsky v. McCarthy
· 2023-09-28
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS the Army’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 32.”

Lapotsky v. McCarthy
· 2023-11-08
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 40.”

Bunting v. District of Columbia CVS Pharmacy, LLC
· 2024-02-07
Motion to exclude expert testimony (plaintiffs) Denied

“the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion, ECF No. 45.”

Bunting v. District of Columbia CVS Pharmacy, LLC
· 2024-08-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court GRANTS CVS’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47).”

Kight v. Crunchy Tobacco, Inc.
· 2025-03-25
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“the Court hereby recommends that Plaintiffs’ Motion be DENIED.”

Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
· 2025-03-13
Motion to stay enforcement (plaintiff) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Klayman’s Motion is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 175 days (N = 3).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 205 days (N = 9).

The random sample includes immigration-delay, employment, motor-vehicle, agricultural-review, and other civil matters, with both pending and terminated cases.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years4
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202604
Sep 202503
Mar 202520
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202322
Sep 202200

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the District of Columbia, not for Judge Upadhyaya: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed3,3477.7 months
Closed with no court action8765.4 months
Closed before pretrial2,4498.8 months
Closed during or after pretrial1353.2 months
Closed during trial9not reported
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20253,3477.7 months
Sep 20243,2906.2 months
Sep 20233,2884.7 months
Sep 20223,0445.6 months
Sep 20213,4084.8 months
Sep 20202,9475.8 months
Sep 20192,9635.1 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Upadhyaya with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Upadhyaya, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Upadhyaya's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace