Matthew J. Sharbaugh

United States District Court for the District of Columbia magistrate 5 signed orders read

How Judge Sharbaugh decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On fee petitions he scrutinizes billing for work attributable to non-prevailing/non-settling parties and segregates or applies percentage reductions, but otherwise defers to reasonable lodestar calculations.

“he applied a general-percentage reduction to any non-segregable work ... recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff’s motion in large part”

Motion outcomes

Counted from classified signed orders only. Percentages are shown only where the sample is large enough to be meaningful; smaller samples are reported as raw counts.

Summary judgment
N = 3
Granted: 1Granted in part: 1Denied: 1 counts only
Motion for attorney fees
N = 1
Granted in part: 1 counts only
Motion to expunge
N = 1
Denied: 1 counts only
Motion for judgment of reversal
N = 1
Granted in part: 1 counts only
Motion to affirm
N = 1
Granted in part: 1 counts only

A "1 of 1" is one ruling, not a tendency. Treat small samples as illustrative, not predictive.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Cabrera v. Mogoo, Inc.
1:22-cv-01816 · 2025-05-08
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Magistrate Judge Sharbaugh recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff’s motion in large part and award $170,009.95 in attorneys’ fees and $2,427.48 in costs.”

Jane Doe v. De Amigos, LLC (motion to expunge; Crim. No. 89-0273)
1:89-cr-00273 · 2025-06-13
Motion to expunge (defendant) Denied

“the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 18] is ADOPTED in its entirety; it is FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion to expunge criminal record [Dkt. # 13] is DENIED.”

William R. v. King (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
1:23-cv-00319 · 2025-02-05
Motion for judgment of reversal (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for judgment of reversal (ECF No. 7) and the Commissioner’s motion for judgment of affirmance (ECF No. 8) both be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART ... and that the case be REMANDED to the SSA pursuant to sentence four”

Motion to affirm (defendant) Granted in part

“the Commissioner’s motion for judgment of affirmance (ECF No. 8) ... be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

Philpot v. District of Columbia
1:23-cv-00671 · 2025-05-06
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Magistrate Judge Sharbaugh recommended that the Court deny Philpot’s motion and grant the District’s cross-motion.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Magistrate Judge Sharbaugh recommended that the Court deny Philpot’s motion and grant the District’s cross-motion.”

J.T. v. District of Columbia
1:24-cv-01400 · 2025-07-21
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“The undersigned recommends that the Court remand for further consideration on the class-size claim, as well.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

From the R&Rs read (NOT a counted distribution): IDEA / special-education merits and attorneys'-fee disputes (Philpot; J.T.; and DCPS FAPE matters dominate his civil referrals), FLSA / D.C. wage-and-hour fee petitions (Cabrera v. Mogoo), Social Security disability appeals (William R. v. King), and miscellaneous criminal (motion to expunge -- Jane Doe/De Amigos) and FOIA referrals (e.g. U.S. Central Command FOIA, per docket records). Referring district judges seen: Randolph D. Moss, Timothy J. Kelly, Jia M. Cobb, Amy Berman Jackson, Amir H. Ali.