June Lazenby Green

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia district Deceased · served 1968–1984 Appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic) 23 signed orders read

Judge Green no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Green decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

She emphasized the public interest in notice and participation for parties affected by government regulation.

“the Court also recognizes the public interest in preserving the rights of parties which are affected by government regulation to be adequately informed when their interests are at stake and to participate in the regulatory process as directed by Congress.”

She found exemplary damages warranted by willful disregard of the petroleum-marketing statute.

“The Court concludes that the conduct of Defendant was in willful disregard of the PMPA”

Cautions

She would not substitute judicial judgment for a reasonable military personnel decision.

“Courts cannot substitute their judgment for that of the military departments when reasonable minds could reach differing conclusions on the same evidence.”

She treated a prior judgment as distinct from a new arbitration raising separate issues.

“the prior judgment at issue is separate and apart from what Ms. Baird seeks in the current arbitration.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Anthony v. Baird
· 1998-07-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; it is further”

Motion for attorney fees and costs (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendant’s request for attorney’s fees and costs is DENIED; it is further”

Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and it is further”

Joyce v. Silveri Tile Co.
· 1999-01-26
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED; it is further”

Motion for supplemental damages (plaintiffs) Granted

“ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Supplemental Damages is GRANTED and the Plaintiffs are awarded supplemental damages as follows:”

American Moving & Storage Assoc., Inc. v. United States Department of Defense
· 2000-03-29
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion is granted and Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied
Long v. District of Columbia
· 1998-06-02
Motion for extension of time (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for extension of time to file its dispositive motion is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to January 12, 1998; it is further”

Motion for leave to file amended opposition (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for leave to file an amended memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and said memorandum is accepted for filing; it is further”

Motion for partial summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED; it is further”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further”

Harrison v. Olivetti Office USA, Inc.
· 1996-07-22
Summary judgment (Olivetti) Granted

“The Court, therefore, grants summary judgment for Olivetti.”

Oparaocha v. Sun Co., Inc.
· 1998-03-18
Motion for exemplary damages (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Exemplary Damages is GRANTED and Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $100,000.00 in exemplary damages; it is further”

Motion for attorney fees expert fees and costs (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees, Expert Witness Fees and Non-Taxable Costs is GRANTED and Defendant shall pay the following:”

Joyce v. Silveri Tile Co., LC
· 1998-11-25
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted

“the Court concludes that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should be granted.”

Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. v. Hawke
· 1999-03-24
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted

“ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; it is further”

Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is DENIED; and it is further”

McDougall v. Widnall
· 1998-09-30
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Therefore, the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied
Sampson v. Citibank, F.S.B.
· 1999-05-27
Summary judgment (disability plans) Granted

“ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant Disability Plans (the Short-Term Disability Plan and the Long-Term Disability Plan) is GRANTED and Count One of the First Amended Complaint (ERISA) is DISMISSED with prejudice; it is further”

Summary judgment (Citibank) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendant Citibank’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Counts Three and Four (ADA claims against Citibank), and Five (FMLA claim against Citibank) are DISMISSED with prejudice; it is further”

Motion for partial summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED; it is further”

Springfield, Inc. v. Buckles
· 2000-09-14
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted
Fagans v. Unisys Corp.
· 1996-11-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is GRANTED and judgment is entered for Defendant; it is further”

A historical record

Judge Green no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.