John M. Facciola

United States District Court for the District of Columbia magistrate 22 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Directed to Department of Veterans Affairs
· 2009-09-03
Motion for reconsideration (petitioner) Denied

“For the reasons discussed herein, Burlodge’s Motion [#18] will be denied.”

In re Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Directed to Department of Veterans Affairs
· 2009-04-28
Motions to compel (petitioner) Denied

“In accordance with the limitations set above, Burlodge’s Motion will be denied.”

West Bay One, Inc. v. Does 1–1,653
· 2012-01-23
Motion to quash subpoena (putative defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that the Motion to Deny Plaintiff’s Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection in a Civil Action [#105] is DENIED.”

Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does
· 2012-01-23
Motion for early discovery (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Take Additional Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof [#16] is DENIED without prejudice.”

Cornered, Inc. v. Does
· 2012-01-23
Motion to quash subpoena (putative defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Campbell’s Exception of Lack of Jurisdiction and Motion to Quash [#84] is DENIED without prejudice.”

Novak v. Douglas A. Lines, P.C.
· 2011-07-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint [#8] is DENIED without prejudice.”

Request for oral argument (plaintiffs) Moot / procedural

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Request for Oral Argument Concerning Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [#10] is DENIED as moot.”

Nguyen v. Winter
· 2010-12-23
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Granted in part

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs First Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Motions to compel (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Compel is DENIED.”

West Bay One, Inc. v. Does 1–1,653
· 2012-01-23
Motion to quash subpoena (putative defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that the Motion to Quash Subpoens [sic] [#100] is DENIED.”

Friendship Edison Public Charter School Collegiate Campus v. Nesbitt
· 2010-04-10
Motion for stay (plaintiff) Denied

“I therefore conclude that plaintiff has failed to meet its burden and that the Motion for Stay of November 18, 2009 Judgment is hereby denied.”

Chevron Corp. v. Salazar
· 2011-09-15
Motion for stay (respondent) Denied

“ORDERED that Respondent Weinberg Group’s Motion for Emergency Stay of Enforcement of this Court’s September 8, 2011 Memorandum and Order and September 13, 2011 Order Pending Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and for Expedited Briefing and Consideration [#31] is DENIED.”

Yung v. IT Discovery, Inc.
· 2012-03-15
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or In the Alternative, Summary Judgment [#47] is granted and plaintiff’s lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice.”

United States v. Salvation Army Southern Territory
· 2013-06-12
Petition to enforce subpoena (United States) Granted

“For the reasons described below, the petition will be granted, subject to certain conditions.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 739 days (N = 6).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 42 days (N = 7).

The randomized historical sample contains contract, motor-vehicle, employment, personal-injury, and Miller Act matters. All six sampled cases were terminated.

Put Judge Facciola's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Facciola actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Facciola's own signed orders and cites them.