James Harry Covington

How Judge Covington rules, drawn from 6 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Covington no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (now U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia)
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1914–1918
Appointed by
Woodrow Wilson (Democratic)
Commissioned
June 15, 1914
Education
University of Pennsylvania Law School, LL.B., 1894
Signed orders read
6

About Judge Covington

James Harry Covington was a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Supreme Court of the District of Columbia). Appointed by President Woodrow Wilson, Judge Covington received a commission on June 15, 1914. Judge Covington resigned on May 31, 1918.

How Judge Covington decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He found no prejudicial variance where the opponent proved a later reduction-to-practice date than the one stated in preliminary patent-interference papers.

“Thompson not being harmed by the variance between the date of reduction to practice alleged in the ‘preliminary statement’ of Storrie and the dale, a later one, established in 1he evidence by Storrie”

He tested whether a claimed automobile trademark was descriptive by asking what features a purchaser would expect the product to possess.

“if he were to receive a car containing less than twelve cylinders, he would feel that he had been deceived. This is considered to be the acid test as to the descriptiveness of the term.”

Cautions

He refused to expand trademark legislation to make a descriptive word registrable for additional related goods.

“The Trademark Act cannot be expanded so as to permit a descriptive word to be registered.”

He confined patent-interference analysis to the elements actually written into the claims.

“the oft-repeated rule that claims will he interpreted as drawn.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

District of Columbia v. Georgetown Gaslight Co.
· 1916-04-10
Tax appeal (District of Columbia) Denied

“Finding no error in the ruling of the court below, the judgment is affirmed, with costs aboye and below. Affirmed.”

District of Columbia v. Washington Gaslight Co.
· 1916-04-10
Tax appeal (District of Columbia) Denied

“for the reasons assigned in that case the judgment is affirmed, with costs above and below.”

In re Armstrong Cork Co.
· 1917-01-09
Trademark appeal (trademark applicant) Denied

“The decision will he affirmed, and this decision certified.to the Commissioner of Patents. Affirmed.”

Neckerman v. Saunders
· 1917-01-09
Patent appeal (patent applicant) Denied

“The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.”

Thompson v. Storrie
· 1917-04-23
Patent appeal (patent applicant) Denied

“the decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed”

In re Packard Motor Car Co.
· 1917-06-11
Trademark appeal (trademark applicant) Denied

“The decision will he affirmed and this decision certified to the Commissioner of Patents. Affirmed.”

A historical record

Judge Covington no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.