Henry Harold Kennedy Jr.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia district No longer serving Appointed by William J. Clinton (Democratic) 26 signed orders read

Judge Kennedy no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Kennedy decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He accepted a records search despite its failure to locate the requested document because adequacy turned on the search method rather than the result.

“An agency’s search will not be presumed inadequate simply because the agency did not find the requested documents.”

He refused voluntary vacatur where it would let an agency repeal a rule without notice, comment, or merits review.

“granting vacatur here would allow the Federal defendants to do what they cannot do under the APA, repeal a rule without public notice and comment, without judicial consideration of the merits.”

He denied a combined dispositive motion when the evidence left a genuine factual dispute over administrative exhaustion.

“This dispute of material fact is genuine.”

Cautions

He treated the absence of irreparable employment harm as sufficient to deny preliminary relief without reaching the remaining factors.

“Because plaintiffs cannot establish that the Merger will cause irreparable harm to LOC Police officers, the Court need not address the remaining preliminary injunction factors”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Johnson v. D.C. Detention Center
· 2008-01-28
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Petitioner makes so such showing, and, therefore, the Court must deny his petition.”

Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. v. Merit Title Co., LLC
· 2008-04-17
Motion to dismiss or stay (defendants) Denied

“ORDERED, that defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the alternative to stay, is DENIED.”

Ok Yeon Cho v. District of Columbia
· 2008-04-22
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Remand to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia is DENIED.”

Mogu v. Chertoff
· 2008-05-08
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“For the foregoing reason, defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

Davis v. Attorney General
· 2008-06-27
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions and the entire record, the Court will grant defendants’ motion and deny plaintiffs motion.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied
Williams v. Gonzales
· 2008-07-22
Motion to construe and transfer (government) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant the Government’s motion for an order to construe Williams’ petition as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and to transfer Williams’ motion to the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for it to determine whether to authorize Williams to file his motion.”

Caston v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys
· 2008-08-22
Motions to dismiss (Executive Office for United States Attorneys) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs FOIA claim is barred under the terms of his plea agreement.”

Jones v. U.S. Department of Justice
· 2008-09-16
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (Department of Justice) Denied

“ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment be, and hereby is, DENIED;”

Wendland v. Gutierrez
· 2008-09-30
Motions to dismiss (Secretary of Commerce) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Secretary’s motion to dismiss must be granted.”

Doe v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
· 2009-03-09
Summary judgment (Provident Life and Accident Insurance) Granted in part

“ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment [# 35] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Bohall v. United States Government
· 2009-03-17
Motions to dismiss (United States) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the court concludes that the motion of the United States should be granted and Bohall’s second amended complaint should be dismissed.”

Armstrong v. Lappin
· 2009-07-02
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion for a TRO is DENIED.”

A historical record

Judge Kennedy no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.