Gerhard Alden Gesell

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia district Deceased · served 1967–1993 Appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic) 21 signed orders read

Judge Gesell no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Gesell decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He rejected an agency classification that treated workers as domestic only when doing so lowered the prevailing-wage calculation.

“To treat the workers as U.S. workers only for the purpose of the wage determination, and for nothing else, is arbitrary and capricious.”

He treated fee awards as ordinarily appropriate under a remedial labor statute absent special circumstances.

“As the LMRDA is a remedial statute, attorney fees are appropriate absent special circumstances rendering such an award unjust.”

Cautions

He viewed the public interest in government transparency as broad enough to include citizens’ ability to complain privately.

“The public interest is broader than plaintiff’s notion, and encompasses not only the uses of the list by both NHTSA and CAS, but also the interests of citizens generally to complain to their government in privacy.”

He refused equitable relief where the claimant’s own misconduct left him without clean hands.

“Stone cannot appeal to equity because he lacks clean hands.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Center for Auto Safety v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
· 1993-01-08
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied
Don Ray Drive-A-Way Co. of California, Inc. v. Skinner
· 1992-02-24
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted; and it is further”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“ORDERED that defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment is denied; and it is further”

Arrington v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, Inc.
· 1992-11-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Court accordingly grants summary judgment to defendant.”

Joseph v. United States Department of Labor
· 1992-01-30
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted and the case is remanded to DOL to set a prevailing wage rate in accordance with the Court’s Memoranda.”

Rastall v. CSX Corp.
· 1988-06-08
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“An Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss and remanding this case to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia is filed herewith.”

Summary judgment (defendants) Moot / procedural

“Defendants’ motion for summary judgment must be left for resolution by that court”

M/A-Com Information Systems, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
· 1986-03-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that summary judgment is granted defendant on its claim that documents claimed to be covered by 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) need not be released; and it is further”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that summary judgment is granted plaintiff on defendant’s exemption claims under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5) and (b)(6); and it is further”

Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that no attorney fees shall be awarded plaintiff and each party shall bear its costs.”

Stone v. Rosenbaum
· 1989-06-02
Summary judgment (Rosenbaum) Granted

“The Court grants Rosenbaum’s renewed motion captioned as a motion for summary judgment and denies Stone’s motion for summary judgment.”

Summary judgment (Stone) Denied
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
· 1991-11-19
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is denied; and it is further”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted; and it is further”

Texas Rural Legal, Aid, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp.
· 1992-01-13
Summary judgment (Legal Services Corporation) Granted

“LSC’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Housley v. United States Department of the Treasury
· 1988-06-29
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice.”

North American Fund Management Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
· 1992-01-10
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Judgment shall be entered for FDIC.”

Steinberg v. U.S. Department of Justice
· 1992-09-30
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.”

A historical record

Judge Gesell no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.