G. Michael Harvey
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Plaintiffs’ motion to compel and for sanctions [Dkt. 44] will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”
“Plaintiffs’ motion for an amended scheduling order [Dkt. 43] will be GRANTED.”
“Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 12] will be GRANTED IN PART”
“DCPS’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 13] will be DENIED.”
“Mark Brown’s petition for attorney’s fees [Dkt. 3699] will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”
“ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ request to engage in limited discovery during the pendency of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.”
“For these reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike [Dkt. 20] is DENIED.”
“ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Permission to File Pleadings [Dkt. 148], Motion for Leave to File Motion to Expedite Proceedings [Dkt. 150], and Motion for Leave to File Status Document [Dkt. 151] are DENIED.”
“ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification and Court-Authorized Notice Pursuant to Section 216(b) of the FLSA and the DCMWA (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as discussed above.”
“ORDERED that Clamant Lazarenko’s motion is DENIED as untimely.”
Held that a pro se claimant's failure to exhaust administrative remedies is not jurisdictional because he had presented his benefits claim to the agency, so a Rule 12(b)(1) motion was the wrong vehicle; rather than rejecting the motion outright, the court construed it under Rule 12(b)(6) and converted it to a summary judgment motion with further briefing. No motion was resolved on the merits.
“Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.”
“Plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.”
“ORDERED that Defendants RoofTopDC, LLC, Noe Landini, and Franco Landini’s mo- tion for attorney’s fees and sanctions (ECF No. 80) is DENIED.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
The sampled matters are concentrated in wage-and-hour suits where he sits as the referred discovery judge and in disability-benefit appeals decided on the parties' consent, with some contract, tort, and insurance work. His more recent docket is largely sealed warrant and criminal complaint duty, which produces no civil motion practice. This bounded sample describes the reviewed records only and is not a census of his caseload.
Put Judge Harvey's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Harvey actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Harvey's own signed orders and cites them.