David Kellogg Cartter

Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (now U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia) district Deceased · served 1863–1887 Appointed by Abraham Lincoln (Republican) 26 signed orders read

Judge Cartter no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Cartter decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In municipal-liability cases Cartter treated a city's own knowledge of a decaying public structure as sufficient notice, dispensing with proof of express notice of the specific defect.

“We hold that the knowledge of these facts was all the notice that was required in this case.”

Procedural preferences

He read statutory formalities for public contracting strictly: an agreement with a District board was unenforceable unless made in the prescribed written, signed form.

“when the statute has prescribed a certain form, it must be followed.”

Cautions

Cartter confined mandamus to strictly ministerial duties and refused it wherever the officer exercised discretion, repeatedly discharging the writ.

“The right to issue the writ of mandamus to officers of the Government is limited to cases where the duties to be performed are strictly ministerial”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Herfurth v. Corporation of Washington
Appeal (Corporation of Washington) Granted

“Judgment reversed and a new trial granted.”

Hill v. Commissioner of Patents
Appeal (applicant-appellant) Denied

“It is the judgment of this court that they have dedicated them to the public, and we, therefore, affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Patents.”

McDermott Bros. v. Garland
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Granted

“This rule being applied it follows that the judgment below must be reversed.”

Johnston v. Randall
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Granted

“The judgment must therefore be reversed, with leave to the plaintiff to amend as he may be advised.”

Kennedy v. Barker
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Anderson v. Smith
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Granted

“The motion for nonsuit should therefore have been granted or the cause continued. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.”

United States ex rel. Warfield v. Boutwell
Mandamus (relator) Denied

“A majority of the court are convinced that the writ will not lie in this case.”

Hayden ex rel. Hayden v. Weser
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“the decree appealed from is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded to ’ the court below with directions to recommit the cause to the auditor with instructions to charge the cost of all permanent improvements to the heir”

District of Columbia v. Van Horn
Appeal (District of Columbia) Granted

“The judgment-is reversed and a new trial granted.”

District of Columbia v. Johnson
Appeal (District of Columbia) Granted

“Judgment reversed and case remanded for a new trial.”

Bragg v. Bletz
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Thompson v. Bowie
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

A historical record

Judge Cartter no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.