Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

How Judge Kollar-Kotelly rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Position
district
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
1997-03-26
Education
Catholic University of America, B.A. (1965); Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law, J.D. (1968)
Signed orders read
18

How Judge Kollar-Kotelly decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A short amendment delay caused by counsel's good-faith oversight can be excused when revised response and discovery deadlines will cure the opposing party's prejudice.

“the Court shall DENY the Defendant’s [19] Motion to Strike, GRANT Ms. Brown’s [20] Motion for Leave to Amend”

At the pleading stage, fact-dependent disputes over meaningful access and reasonable accommodations are left for discovery rather than resolved against a plausibly pleaded claim.

“whether a particular type of accommodation is reasonable is commonly a contextual and fact-specific inquiry.”

Procedural preferences

When an enforceable employment arbitration agreement covers all asserted claims, she compels arbitration and stays the judicial action until arbitration is complete.

“Accordingly, this case will be stayed pending completion of arbitration.”

Interlocutory certification and reconsideration are denied when the proposed issues depend on the factual record or merely repackage arguments already decided.

“this Court DENIES Defendants’ [617] Motion for Certification for Interlocutory Appeal and [618] Motion for Reconsideration”

Cautions

Parallel federal proceedings involving the same parties and dispute may be dismissed without prejudice after an equitable assessment favors the earlier-filed forum.

“Respondent’s [4] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Tucker v. Blinken
1:22-cv-01854 · 2025-03-04
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court shall GRANT the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and DENY AS MOOT the Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment.”

Motion for judgment on pleadings (defendant) Moot / procedural
M.R. v. District of Columbia
1:25-cv-00556 · 2025-06-03
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court shall GRANT the Plaintiffs' Motion and DENY the Defendant's Cross-Motion.”

Preliminary injunction (defendant) Denied
Washington-Baltimore News Guild, Local 32035 v. Washington Post
1:22-cv-02484 · 2023-07-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court shall GRANT Defendant's [14] Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and DENY Plaintiff's [10] Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.”

Motion for judgment on pleadings (plaintiff) Denied
Carter v. National Security Agency
1:12-cv-00968 · 2012-11-13
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Court will treat the defendant's motion as conceded and will enter judgment in the defendant's favor.”

Woods v. District of Columbia
1:20-cv-00782 · 2022-03-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court shall GRANT Defendants' [20] Motion to Strike the Amended Complaint and Dismiss the Action with Prejudice and DENY Plaintiff's [21] Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint Nunc Pro Tunc.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied
Cummings v. United States Department of Justice
1:22-cv-02251 · 2023-07-06
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Pending is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the following reasons, the motion will be granted.”

Shanks v. International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
1:24-cv-00222 · 2024-10-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Upon consideration of the briefing, the relevant legal authorities, and the entire record, the Court shall GRANT the Motion to Dismiss.”

Brown v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO
1:25-cv-04466 · 2026-07-21
Motions to strike (defendant) Denied

“the Court shall DENY the Defendant’s [19] Motion to Strike, GRANT Ms. Brown’s [20] Motion for Leave to Amend”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted
Joshua M. Ambush, LLC v. Rusnak
1:26-cv-01247 · 2026-07-23
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“Respondent’s [4] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Center for Taxpayer Rights v. Internal Revenue Service
1:25-cv-00457 · 2025-10-01
Motions to stay (defendant) Denied

“the Court shall DENY Defendants' [42] motion to stay their deadline to file the administrative record.”

Reinhardt v. Guidehouse, Inc.
1:22-cv-01237 · 2025-09-09
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ Motions are GRANTED.”

Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted
Americans for Immigrant Justice v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
1:22-cv-03118 · 2025-10-06
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the Court shall DENY Defendants’ Motion.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • Sampled recent assignments (filed 2026, all pending) are heavy on FOIA (895, Defending Rights & Dissent v. State, FIRE v. DHS, Judicial Watch v. DHS, Williams v. DoD), ANTITRUST (410, United States v. Taiheiyo Cement Corp.; she also has the In re Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust MDL and historically United States v. Microsoft), IMMIGRATION (465, Saeed/Chuang/Cai v. Mullin), APA/agency review (899), ERISA (791, IAM National Pension Fund v. Darling Ingredients), copyright (Strike 3 Holdings), and arbitration (896).
  • This is a qualitative character sample, NOT a counted nature-of-suit distribution.

Draft for Judge Kollar-Kotelly with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Kollar-Kotelly, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Kollar-Kotelly's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace