Abram Baldwin Olin

Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (now U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia) district Deceased · served 1863–1879 Appointed by Abraham Lincoln (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Olin no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Olin decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He enforced the written terms of a contract when the opposing evidence would contradict the instrument rather than prove a later modification.

“The rule which excludes parol evidence from contradicting or varying a written instrument is based upon the principle that when parties draw up and sign a written instrument, such instrument expresses their whole agreement in regard to the matter of contract.”

He required fraud, false representation, or imposition before disturbing a completed judicial sale.

“this court will not set aside a sale unless some fraud, false statement or imposition is practiced which has misled the purchaser.”

Cautions

He strongly rejected a divorce suit resting on facts the complainant knew before marriage.

“if all the facts falsely stated in the bill were admitted to be true, they afford no ground for a divorce from the bond of matrimony, unless we apply to the solemn contract of marriage the same rules of law that we do to a contract for swapping horses.”

He emphasized the gravity of fraud against the Treasury when affirming a false-claim conviction.

“The evidence recited in the bills of exceptions clearly shows that Bowen was a willing instrument in the attempt to perpetrate a gross fraud upon the Treasury”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Murray v. Ormes
· 1881-07-01
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.”

Pomeroy v. Clark
· 1874-09-15
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“the judgment below should be affirmed.”

Worch v. Kelly
· 1868-01-31
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“The judgment of the Court below is affirmed.”

In re the Estate of Ames
· 1881-07-01
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“The decree of the court in special term for probate business is affirmed.”

United States v. Bowen
· 1881-07-01
Criminal appeal (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“The judgment in this case is affirmed, and the warden of the jail is directed to carry into execution the sentence of the Criminal Court.”

Varden v. Todd
· 1874-09-15
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“The judgment of the circuit must be affirmed.”

Cassin v. Bozzle
· 1868-02-25
Bill in equity (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“Decree dismissing the bill.”

Converse v. Washington & Georgetown Railroad
· 1876-04-15
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“The judgment must therefore be affirmed.”

Kean v. Kean
· 1869-05-18
Divorce petition (appellant or petitioner) Moot / procedural

“An order will therefore be made referring this case back to the examiner to take such further proofs as may be deemed necessary, the proofs already taken to stand as part of such proofs.”

Linville v. Holden
· 1876-01-15
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Granted

“The judgment in this case must be reversed, and a new trial granted.”

Adams Express Co. v. Adams
· 1874-09-15
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Denied

“The decree of the court in special term should be affirmed.”

Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Dennison
· 1881-07-01
Appeal (appellant or petitioner) Granted

“We think the decree in this case should be reversed, and an order made appointing some competent engineer to take proofs of the reasonable and necessary costs of constructing a sewer under the tracks of the complainant’s road”

A historical record

Judge Olin no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.