Warren W. Eginton

How Judge Eginton rules, drawn from 5 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Eginton no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1979–2019
Appointed by
Jimmy Carter (Democratic)
Commissioned
July 24, 1979
Education
A.B., Princeton University, 1948; LL.B., Yale Law School, 1951
Signed orders read
5

About Judge Eginton

Warren William Eginton was a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Appointed by President Jimmy Carter, Judge Eginton received a commission on July 24, 1979. Judge Eginton assumed senior status on August 1, 1992 and served until death on October 7, 2019.

How Judge Eginton decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Karath v. Board of Trustees of Tunxis Community College, he deemed the defendant's summary-judgment facts admitted after the plaintiff failed to file the counter-statement required by Local Rule 56(a), and granted the motion.

“defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #44) is GRANTED. The Clerk is instructed to close this case.”

Cautions

In Caban, Eginton denied the municipality’s motion for summary judgment.

“the Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. #46] is DENIED.”

In Fisher, Eginton granted dismissal and allowed the plaintiffs fifteen days to file a short, plain amended complaint.

“defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. 13] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may submit an amended complaint containing a short and plain statement of their claim for relief within 15 days.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Karath v. Board of Trustees of Tunxis Community College
3:07-cv-01073-WWE · 2009-12-10
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #44) is GRANTED. The Clerk is instructed to close this case.”

Caban v. Dupont (Town of East Hartford)
3:09-cv-00786-WWE · 2011-05-10
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. #46] is DENIED.”

Fisher v. Bank of America
3:11-cv-01099-WWE · 2012-05-31
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. 13] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may submit an amended complaint containing a short and plain statement of their claim for relief within 15 days.”

Diaz v. Torrington Car Care, LLC
3:16-cv-01544-WWE · 2018-01-29
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“the Court hereby DENIES the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment [doc. 38] and DENIES the defendants' motion for summary judgment [doc. 39].”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
In re Clinton Sailing Club, Inc.
3:17-cv-01286-WWE · 2018-04-24
Motions to dismiss (claimant) Denied

“claimant's motion to dismiss [#9] is DENIED.”

Pending matters in the official report

Judge Eginton was last listed in the Civil Justice Reform Act report as of September 30, 2020.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Eginton no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.