Warren Booth Burrows

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut district Deceased · served 1928–1930 Appointed by Calvin Coolidge (Republican) 20 signed orders read

Judge Burrows no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Burrows decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He found patent validity and infringement supported by the presumption of validity, commercial success, and the absence of prior art disclosing the claimed combination.

“On the record presented, in view of tho presumption of validity which atta.ches to the grant of a patent, the proven success of tho patented device, and the fact that no one of tho prior patents or the alleged prior use discloses the combination recited in the claims, I am constrained to hold that the claims are valid and infringed.”

He inferred intent to deceive from numerous points of similarity between competing product designs.

“The greater number of points of similarity, the stronger is the inference of an intentional imitation with intent to deceive.”

Cautions

He denied equitable intervention against state enforcement where the petitioner could obtain an adequate remedy in state court.

“the petitioner is seeking the aid of this court to prevent due process of law in the state courts, where an adequate remedy already exists”

He declined to revive a surety obligation after the surety had relied on a final decree and returned its collateral.

“having acted /upon the judgment of July 23, 1927, as they had a right to do, whereby their relation to the court and to each other had changed, it is my opinion that .the order and deeree of November 22, 1927, did nob re*979vive the former stipulation.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Eaton
· 1928-06-23
Tax refund claim (plaintiffs) Denied

“Judgment may therefore be entered for the defendant in each case, without costs.”

Warner v. Walsh
· 1928-07-12
Tax refund claim (plaintiff) Denied

“judgment may be entered for the defendant; and it is so ordered.”

National Institute, Inc. v. Nutt
· 1928-08-13
Copyright infringement claim (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff may have a decree for an injunction and an accounting, with actual damages, together with its costs; and it is so ordered.”

In re Munsie
· 1929-01-10
Bankruptcy review petition (creditor Dora Gottlieb) Denied

“The petitions are dismissed, and the referee’s findings and conclusions are in all respects affirmed and accepted”

Bankruptcy review petition (trustee) Denied
Trico Products Corporation v. Ace Products Corporation
· 1929-01-15
Patent infringement claim (plaintiff) Granted

“Let a decree be entered holding that the defendant company has been guilty of unfair competition in the packaging and advertising of their windshield wipers, and that plaintiff’s patent, No. 3,659,406, is valid and infringed.”

Unfair competition claim (plaintiff regarding packaging and advertising) Granted

“Let a decree be entered holding that the defendant company has been guilty of unfair competition in the packaging and advertising of their windshield wipers”

Unfair competition claim (plaintiff regarding product manufacture) Denied

“The bill of complaint, in so far as it charges unfair competition by the defendant company on account of the manufacture of windshield wipers per se (irrespective of the containers or wrappers), is dismissed.”

Claim against individual defendants (plaintiff) Denied

“The hill of complaint as against the individual defendants, George M. La Vietes and Miriam E. La Vietes, is dismissed.”

Thames Towboat Co.
· 1929-01-16
Motion to compel transfer or stipulation (claimant) Granted

“An ad interim stipulation for value with approved surety in the sum of $11,001.56, nunc pro tunc as of September 24, 1925, should be given by the petitioner, the Thames Towboat Company, or the lighter Atlas and her freight for the voyage in question should be transferred to a trustee”

Gaston v. New London Northern R.
· 1929-05-29
Demurrer to complaint (defendant) Granted

“The demurrer is therefore sustained, and it is so ordered.”

Skinner v. Eaton
· 1929-08-06
Tax refund claim (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“the issues must be decided in favor of the defendant, except as to so much of plaintiffs’ claims as were conceded.”

Skinner v. Eaton
· 1929-08-06
Tax refund claim (plaintiffs) Denied

“The defendant’s motion for judgment and costs is granted.”

Boyd v. United States
· 1929-08-09
Demurrer to complaint (United States) Denied

“The demurrer is overruled.”

A. C. Gilbert Co. v. Shemitz
· 1929-11-29
Patent infringement claim (plaintiff) Granted

“It is a new creation, and the plaintiff’s patent is valid.”

Unfair competition claim (plaintiff) Granted

“It is my opinion that the evidence supports the charge of unfair competition. The plaintiff may have an injunction with costs.”

James H. Bunce Co. v. Eaton
· 1929-12-05
Tax refund claim (plaintiff) Denied

“Defendant’s motion for judgment is granted. The plaintiff’s action is dismissed, with costs to the defendant.”

A historical record

Judge Burrows no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.