Sarala V. Nagala

How Judge Nagala rules, drawn from 29 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
Appointed by
Joe Biden (Democratic)
Commissioned
2021-11-02
Education
Stanford University (B.A., 2005); University of California, Berkeley School of Law (J.D., 2008)
Signed orders read
29

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Qian Haocheng v. YouTube, Inc.
3:23-cv-00513-SVN · 2024-03-28
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the following reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

Cariati Developers, Inc. v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. (VZ United)
3:22-cv-00383-SVN · 2025-01-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons described herein, VZ United's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

Martin v. Integon National Insurance Co.
3:22-cv-00736-SVN · 2025-07-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“For the reasons described herein, Integon's motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' direct action claim (Count One), and GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' bad faith claim (Count Two).”

Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiffs' motion for an order dismissing Count Two is DENIED AS MOOT.”

Ambrose v. Lee
3:25-cv-00398-SVN · 2026-03-31
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“For the reasons described herein, Defendant's pending motion to dismiss at ECF No. 30 is GRANTED in part as to Count Five of Plaintiff's complaint and DENIED in all other respects.”

Manigault v. Greceanu
3:24-cv-02027 · 2025-09-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For these reasons, the Government's motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Moot / procedural

“The Court also DENIES as moot CDHP's and DDS's motions to dismiss.”

Wynn v. New Haven Board of Education
3:21-cv-00925 · 2024-03-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons discussed below, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

Modise v. CareOne Health Services, LLC
3:20-cv-00765 · 2023-02-27
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to Defendant's counterclaims for negligence and negligence per se pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f).”

A.B. Corp. v. Dunkin' Donuts Franchising, LLC
3:22-cv-01474 · 2022-11-30
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Denied

“For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's second motion for a TRO, and it will hold in abeyance Plaintiff's first motion for a preliminary injunction until the scheduled evidentiary hearing.”

Savinova v. Nova Home Care, LLC
3:20-cv-01612 · 2024-07-26
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Denied

“For these reasons, Southern's and Nova's motions for reconsideration are denied in their entirety.”

Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“For these reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration is denied.”

Class certification (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs' renewed motion for class certification is therefore denied.”

Cornish v. Guardian Asset Management
3:23-cv-01612 · 2025-06-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“For the reasons described above, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's third amended complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

LifeVoxel.AI Inc. v. Mamillapalli
3:23-cv-00534 · 2024-03-29
Motion to compel arbitration (plaintiff) Granted in part

“For the reasons described herein, Plaintiff's motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED in part, insofar as Defendant is ordered to arbitrate in accordance with the agreement between the parties pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 4, and DENIED in part, insofar as Plaintiff requests the appointment of an arbitrator pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 5.”

Linders v. Festival Fun Parks, LLC
3:25-cv-00659 · 2026-03-06
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons described herein, Defendant's motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration, ECF No. 20, is DENIED.”

Draft for Judge Nagala with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Nagala, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Nagala's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace