Robert Carmine Zampano

How Judge Zampano rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Zampano no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1964–1994
Appointed by
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
Commissioned
August 15, 1964
Education
Yale University, B.A., 1951; Yale Law School, LL.B., 1954
Signed orders read
25

About Judge Zampano

Robert Carmine Zampano was a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, Judge Zampano received a commission on August 15, 1964. Judge Zampano assumed senior status on June 1, 1977 and retired on April 1, 1994.

How Judge Zampano decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Moses v. Avco, he denied class certification after finding that the proposed subclasses spanned dissimilar job categories and raised representation conflicts.

“It is questionable under plaintiffs’ showing that each subclass, which include all these groups, is sufficiently homogeneous and free of conflicts to merit certification.”

Cautions

He described preliminary injunctions as extraordinary relief requiring a clear showing of irreparable harm and merits strength.

“It is well established that a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy that should not be granted except upon a clear showing of 1) irreparable harm and 2) either a) a likelihood of success on the merits or b) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly in favor of the party seeking the relief.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Coudert v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis
· 1982-04-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted, without prejudice.”

Holt v. Continental Group, Inc.
· 1982-04-15
Request for preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, the plaintiff’s application for injunctive relief is denied;”

Clark v. Romeo
· 1983-04-20
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint is denied.”

United States v. Andrews
· 1976-05-18
Motion for judgment of acquittal (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal is granted.”

Lewis v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
· 1977-12-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, under the circumstances, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied.”

Murphy v. Marmon Group, Inc.
· 1983-05-03
Motions to strike (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, the motion to strike is denied and Marmon shall respond forthwith to Murphy’s offer of judgment dated March 24, 1982.”

United States ex rel. Watson v. Norton
· 1971-09-22
Motion to expunge detainer (petitioner) Granted in part

“Ordered, that in the absence of a specific trial date (or term of court) from the State of Florida, by letter to this Court, with a copy to Warden Norton, within 15 days from the date of this order, the Warden shall expunge the detainers complained of from petitioner’s file;”

Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (petitioner) Granted

“Ordered, that the petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis be and hereby is granted”

United States v. Levy
· 1971-07-21
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“Ordered that the defendants’ motion to dismiss be and the same hereby is denied.”

United States ex rel. Dewolfe v. Norton
· 1971-09-21
Motion to expunge detainer (petitioner) Granted

“Ordered, that the Warden forthwith expunge the detainer from petitioner’s file.”

Wisdom v. Norton
· 1974-01-03
Request for declaratory and injunctive relief (plaintiffs) Granted

“Accordingly, judgment for the plaintiffs may enter;”

Moses v. Avco Corp.
· 1982-12-15
Class certification (plaintiffs) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the motion for class certification is denied.”

Hooper v. United States
· 1971-07-28
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Ordered that the defendants’ motions to dismiss be, and the same hereby are, granted.”

A historical record

Judge Zampano no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.