Janet Bond Arterton
How Judge Arterton rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
Judge Arterton no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.
About Judge Arterton
Janet Bond Arterton served on the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut after receiving her commission on March 24, 1995. She assumed senior status on July 1, 2014, and became inactive on October 15, 2023.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Cross-Claim Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 39] is GRANTED, and Cross-Claim Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 38] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close this case.”
“Cross-Claim Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 38] is DENIED.”
“defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 78] is GRANTED in its entirety and this case will be closed.”
“defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 25] is DENIED. ... the Court declines to abstain in favor of the state court action, will deny defendants' motion”
“plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Ruling [Doc. # 35] is OVERRULED, and the Recommended Ruling [Doc. # 29] is APPROVED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 15] is GRANTED ... The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.”
“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 22] is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close this case.”
“Defendants' motions [Doc. ## 35, 45] to dismiss are GRANTED”
“Plaintiff's Motion [Doc. # 50] to Strike is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close this case.”
“CMEEC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. # 61] is granted as to the inapplicability of the ambiguous Commission Exclusion and denied as to the request for summary judgment on the remaining counts”
“National Union's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 78] is denied as to the applicability of the Commissions Exclusion and granted as to whether losses associated with responding to the 2016 Subpoena and the 2017 Subpoena fall within the scope of the D&O Coverage Section”
“CMEEC's Motion to Preclude Testimony of Defendant's Proposed Expert David Paige [Doc. # 81] is granted in part and denied in part”
“National Union's Motion to Preclude Plaintiff's Expert James Bergenn [Docs. ## 85, 87] is granted.”
“Defendants' Motion for Sanctions [Doc # 72] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are precluded from offering evidence in support of the 10,619 Itemized Claims”
“The Court DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of standing, CUTPA and Tortious Interference claims; it GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Lanham Act and Sherman Antitrust Act claims.”
“plaintiffs' Motion to Remand [Doc. # 11] is GRANTED and the Clerk is directed to remand this case to the Connecticut Superior Court”
“Defendant Yother's motion to dismiss [Doc. # 17] is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and close this case.”
“Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 62] is DENIED.”
Pending matters in the official report
Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.
| Motions pending more than six months | 0 |
| Bench trials submitted more than six months | 0 |
| Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months | 0 |
| Social Security appeals pending more than six months | 0 |
| Civil cases pending more than three years | 0 |
| Report | Motions over six months | Cases over three years |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | 0 | 1 |
| Mar 2025 | 0 | 1 |
| Sep 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2021 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 2021 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep 2020 | 0 | 0 |
A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.
A historical record
Judge Arterton no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.