Janet Bond Arterton
Judge Arterton no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Cross-Claim Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 39] is GRANTED, and Cross-Claim Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 38] is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close this case.”
“Cross-Claim Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 38] is DENIED.”
“defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 78] is GRANTED in its entirety and this case will be closed.”
“defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 25] is DENIED. ... the Court declines to abstain in favor of the state court action, will deny defendants' motion”
“plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Ruling [Doc. # 35] is OVERRULED, and the Recommended Ruling [Doc. # 29] is APPROVED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 15] is GRANTED ... The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.”
“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 22] is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close this case.”
“Defendants' motions [Doc. ## 35, 45] to dismiss are GRANTED”
“Plaintiff's Motion [Doc. # 50] to Strike is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close this case.”
“CMEEC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. # 61] is granted as to the inapplicability of the ambiguous Commission Exclusion and denied as to the request for summary judgment on the remaining counts”
“National Union's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 78] is denied as to the applicability of the Commissions Exclusion and granted as to whether losses associated with responding to the 2016 Subpoena and the 2017 Subpoena fall within the scope of the D&O Coverage Section”
“CMEEC's Motion to Preclude Testimony of Defendant's Proposed Expert David Paige [Doc. # 81] is granted in part and denied in part”
“National Union's Motion to Preclude Plaintiff's Expert James Bergenn [Docs. ## 85, 87] is granted.”
“Defendants' Motion for Sanctions [Doc # 72] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are precluded from offering evidence in support of the 10,619 Itemized Claims”
“The Court DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of standing, CUTPA and Tortious Interference claims; it GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Lanham Act and Sherman Antitrust Act claims.”
“plaintiffs' Motion to Remand [Doc. # 11] is GRANTED and the Clerk is directed to remand this case to the Connecticut Superior Court”
“Defendant Yother's motion to dismiss [Doc. # 17] is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and close this case.”
“Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 62] is DENIED.”
A historical record
Judge Arterton no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.