Holly B. Fitzsimmons

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut magistrate Retired 2015 · served 1993–2015 13 signed orders read

Judge Fitzsimmons no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Fitzsimmons decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Fitzsimmons denied preliminary relief when the movants did not establish irreparable harm.

“plaintiffs have not provided sufficient evidence to support a finding of irreparable harm”

She construed privilege ambiguities against the party asserting the privilege.

“Any ambiguities as to whether the essential elements [of the attorney-client privilege] have been met are construed against the party asserting the privilege.”

Procedural preferences

Fitzsimmons required counsel to confer before filing further discovery motions.

“the plaintiff will schedule a discovery conference before filing any future discovery motions.”

She used supplemental expert reports and additional deposition time to cure disclosure deficiencies.

“supplemental reports and additional time to depose expert witnesses”

Cautions

Fitzsimmons enforced the local good-faith-conference requirement before considering discovery sanctions.

“This rule serves an important purpose, namely to conserve the scarce resources of the Court and to encourage counsel to engage in a good faith effort to eliminate or reduce areas of controversy”

She refused to shift electronic-production costs where the requested waiver was unsupported.

“Plaintiffs Motion for Waiver of IT Costs [Doc. # 103] is DENIED.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Murphy v. Barberino Brothers, Inc.
· 2001-10-31
Motion for sanctions (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ Motions for Sanctions and to Compel [Doc. #18, 24] are DENIED for failure to comply with D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 9(d)(2).”

Motions to compel (plaintiffs) Denied
Brousseau v. Postmaster General
· 2002-08-27
Motion for protective order (defendant) Granted

“the court approves defendant’s use of the redacted report. A protective order shall enter with respect to the redacted information.”

Bernstein v. Mafcote, Inc.
· 2014-09-02
Motion for protective order (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion for protective order [Doc. # 71] is DENIED.”

Jackson v. AFSCME Local 196
· 2007-10-30
Motion to quash (nonparty) Granted in part

“the motion to quash [Doc.# 46] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Motions to compel (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the motion to compel [Doc. #64] is also GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Motion for waiver of it costs (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs Motion for Waiver of IT Costs [Doc. # 103] is DENIED.”

Farricielli v. Rocque
· 2001-03-02
Preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. # 103], is DENIED.”

Parris v. Pappas
· 2012-01-04
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiffs motions for attorneys’ fees are GRANTED in the amount of $87,392.50. [Doc. # 72, 80].”

Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted
Eadie v. McMahon
· 2001-01-26
Motion to disclose new experts (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“plaintiffs’ Motion for Permission to Disclose New Expert Witnesses is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Martino v. Korch
· 2000-11-03
Motion in limine (plaintiff) Granted in part

“plaintiffs Motion in Limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Doc. # 21.]”

Rand-Whitney Containerboard Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Montville
· 2007-09-11
Motion to approve supersedeas bond (defendants) Denied

“defendants’ Motion to approve a proposed supersedeas bond [Doc. #564] is DENIED.”

Motion to stay execution (defendants) Denied

“the defendants’ Emergency Supplemental Motion for stay of execution of judgment [Doc. # 572] is DENIED.”

Motion for expedited ruling (defendants) Granted

“The Motion for expedited ruling on motion for approval of supersedeas bond [Doc. #573] is GRANTED in accordance with this ruling and order.”

Motion for leave to file surreply (plaintiff) Granted

“the Motion for leave [Doc. # 570] is GRANTED.”

Hayes v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
· 2001-05-09
Motion for reconsideration (defendants) Denied

“defendants’ motion to reconsider [Doc. #20] is DENIED.”

Uniroyal Chemical Co. v. Syngenta Crop Protection
· 2004-07-21
Motions to compel (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion to compel [doc # 33] is denied”

Motions to compel (defendant) Granted in part

“defendant’s motion to compel [doc # 29] is granted in part and denied in part.”

Codespoti & Associates, P.C. v. Bartlett
· 1999-03-29
Application for prejudgment remedy (plaintiffs) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ Application for a Prejudgment Remedy [Doc. # 29] is therefore GRANTED in the amount of $97,000.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 895 days (N = 6).

The six randomly sampled terminated matters include two employment civil-rights cases and one each involving consumer credit, employee benefits, personal injury, and motor-vehicle injury.

A historical record

Judge Fitzsimmons no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.