Dominic J. Squatrito

How Judge Squatrito rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Squatrito no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1994–2021
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
October 7, 1994
Education
B.A., Wesleyan University, 1961; LL.B., Yale Law School, 1965
Signed orders read
7

About Judge Squatrito

Dominic J. Squatrito was a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Appointed by President William J. Clinton, Judge Squatrito received a commission on October 7, 1994. Judge Squatrito assumed senior status on November 1, 2004 and served until death on January 21, 2021.

How Judge Squatrito decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Rivera, Squatrito denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

“For the foregoing reasons defendant's to dismiss (dkt. # 13) is DENIED.”

Cautions

In Standic BV v. CD Industries, he dismissed a nonresident corporate officer for lack of personal jurisdiction because Connecticut's long-arm statute did not reach his acts solely in a corporate capacity.

“Davis's motion to dismiss (doc. # 26) is GRANTED and Davis is dismissed from this action.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Rivera v. Corporate Receivables, Inc.
3:06-cv-00531-DJS · 2006-10-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons defendant's to dismiss (dkt. # 13) is DENIED.”

Standic BV v. CD Industries, Ltd. and Gregory L. Davis
3:11-cv-01765-DJS · 2014-03-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Davis's motion to dismiss (doc. # 26) is GRANTED and Davis is dismissed from this action.”

Lagueux v. Bridgeport Hospital School of Nursing
3:11-cv-01933-DJS · 2013-03-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the motion to dismiss filed by the defendant Griffin Hospital (doc. # 13) is GRANTED”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the partial motion to dismiss filed by the defendant Bridgeport Hospital (doc. # 12) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Yee v. Roofing by Classic Restorations
3:09-cv-00311-DJS · 2011-02-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“SantaFe's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (dkt. # 14) is GRANTED ... Judgment in favor of defendant SantaFe Tile Corporation shall enter on all claims.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“Yee's motion for leave to amend his Complaint and join Classic Slate & Tile, Inc., as a new party defendant (dkt. # 49) is GRANTED.”

Perkins v. State of Connecticut
3:11-cv-00870-DJS · 2012-09-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED. ... The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the respondent and close this case.”

Taylor v. Lantz
3:03-cv-02132-DJS · 2006-03-29
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Granted

“The Motion for Reconsideration [doc. # 22] is GRANTED. After careful reconsideration, the court AFFIRMS the Ruling [doc. # 21] ... staying this action as to claims two and three pending petitioner's completion of the exhaustion process as to claims one and four.”

Alvarez v. Hansen (Town of Suffield)
3:05-cv-01718-DJS · 2007-06-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“defendants' motion to dismiss (dkt. # 15) is GRANTED in part ... to the extent defendants' motion to dismiss ... seeks to dismiss Alvarez's complaint for failing to state a claim ... their motion is DENIED. ... the defendants' motion to dismiss ... Alvarez's equal protection claim against the Town on the basis of res judicata is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The defendants motion for summary judgment (dkt. # 25) is GRANTED. Judgment shall enter for the defendants on all counts of the complaint.”

Johnson-Barnwell v. FCI Danbury et al.
3:10-cv-01301-DJS · 2014-03-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. #43] is GRANTED.”

Award v. Wisner et al.
3:15-cv-00175-DJS · 2017-08-23
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 95] is GRANTED.”

Williams v. City of New Haven
3:10-cv-01164-DJS · 2014-03-21
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the defendant City of New Haven’s motion for summary judgment (doc. # 31) is GRANTED.”

Lenox v. Town of North Branford et al.
3:08-cv-01448-DJS · 2013-05-16
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Granted in part

“the defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration (doc. # 91) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Feeney v. Dunham
3:06-cv-00310-DJS · 2007-04-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment (dkt. # 23) is GRANTED”

Motions to strike (plaintiff) Denied

“plaintiffs’ motion to strike (dkt. # 29) is DENIED”

Pending matters in the official report

Judge Squatrito was last listed in the Civil Justice Reform Act report as of September 30, 2020.

Motions pending more than six months1
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years4

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Squatrito no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.