Lorraine Murphy Weil

How Judge Weil rules, drawn from 14 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Weil no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2013
Served
1999–2013
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Commissioned
1999-01-01
Signed orders read
14

How Judge Weil decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Issue preclusion supported summary judgment when the earlier record showed that willful and malicious conduct was actually litigated and necessary to the judgment.

“The S/J Motion is granted as to Count One and Count Five of the Complaint”

Procedural preferences

Disputes turning on intent and state of mind were treated as poor candidates for summary judgment.

“Courts generally find summary judgment to be ill-suited for resolving cases involving allegations of intent....”

Cautions

Poor planning and judgment did not by themselves establish the intentional wrongdoing required for a fraud-based exception to discharge.

“However, the foregoing represents poor judgment on the Debtors' part, not ‘moral turpitude.’”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Connecticut Attorneys Title Insurance v. Budnick (In Re Budnick)
· 2012-04-09
Nondischargeability adversary claim (title insurer) Granted in part

“the court concludes that (a) the Judgment Debt was not discharged in this chapter 7 case pursuant to Section 523(a)(2)(A) to the extent that such debt relates to the Subsequent Embezzlements, and (b) the remainder of the Judgment Debt was discharged in this chapter 7 case.”

Motion to amend complaint (title insurer) Granted in part

“that request to amend is granted but only as to ‘embezzlement’ within the purview of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).”

Rigoni Di Asiago S.P.A. v. Mucci (In Re Mucci)
· 2011-10-14
Summary judgment (plaintiffs on Count One) Granted

“The S/J Motion is granted as to Count One and Count Five of the Complaint”

Summary judgment (plaintiffs on Count Five) Granted
Malicki v. Bernstein (In Re Bernstein)
· 2011-04-18
Objection to discharge adversary claim (creditor) Denied

“judgment shall enter (a) for the Debtor on the Amended Complaint, determining that discharge shall enter in this chapter 7 case, and (b) for Mr. Malicki on the Counterclaim, ordering that the Debtor shall take nothing on the Counterclaim.”

Automatic stay damages counterclaim (debtor) Denied
In Re Depinna
· 2011-03-24
Nondischargeability adversary claim (plaintiffs under Section 523(a)(2)(A)) Denied

“the Plaintiffs cannot prevail on their Section 523(a)(2)(A) claim of nondischargeability.”

Nondischargeability adversary claim (plaintiffs under Section 523(a)(4)) Denied

“the Plaintiffs cannot prevail on their Section 523(a)(4) claim of nondischargeability.”

In Re Gaylor
· 2007-11-29
Motion to approve stipulation (lessor) Denied

“the Motion is denied as unnecessary”

In Re Longo
· 2007-03-19
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (United States Trustee) Denied

“The Proposed Deduction is proper. Accordingly, the Motion is denied and the Objection is sustained”

Cadle Co. v. Banner (In Re Banner)
· 2008-08-27
Motion for relief from automatic stay (The Cadle Company) Granted

“a separate order shall enter granting the R/S Motion (Doc. I.D. No. 15);”

Objection to exemption (The Cadle Company) Granted

“the Exemption Objection (Doc. I.D. No. 32) is sustained;”

Motion to avoid judicial lien (debtor) Denied

“the Section 522(f) Motion (Doc. I.D. No. 85) is denied in its entirety;”

In Re Fox
· 2006-10-26
Motion to avoid judicial lien (debtor) Granted in part

“the NWP Lien shall be avoided to the extent of $33,328.42 and is unaffected to the extent of $118,138.77.”

H.J. Bushka Lumber & Millwork v. Boucher (In Re Boucher)
· 2005-12-23
Default judgment (H.J. Bushka Lumber and Millwork) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, the Motion is denied in all respects.”

Master-Halco, Inc. v. Picard (In Re Picard)
· 2006-03-23
Motions to dismiss (debtor) Granted in part

“the Debtor’s Motion To Dismiss is granted as to Count Four but only with respect to transfers of the Debtor’s own assets. The remainder of the Motion is denied.”

In Re Lemoine
· 2008-03-19
Motion to approve reaffirmation agreement (debtor) Denied

“the court has concluded that the Reaffirmation Agreement should be stricken from the record because it was filed after the Discharge entered.”

Automated Salvage Transport, Co. Ex Rel. Automated Salvage Transport, Inc. v. Swirsky (In Re Swirsky)
· 2006-12-08
Summary judgment (debtor) Denied

“the Debtor Motion is denied”

Summary judgment (Automated Salvage Transport, Inc.) Denied

“the ASTI Motion is denied”

Motions to strike (first movant) Moot / procedural

“the First Motion To Strike is denied as moot”

Motions to strike (second movant) Moot / procedural

“the Second Motion To Strike is denied as moot”

Motion for extension of time (movant) Moot / procedural

“the Extension Motion is denied as moot”

A historical record

Judge Weil no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.