William Joseph Martínez

United States District Court for the District of Colorado district Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 29 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Vance v. El Paso County Board of Commissioners (Club Q)
1:24-cv-03190-WJM-MDB · 2025-07-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For all these reasons, the Court has no choice but to dismiss the state-created danger claims. ... For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. (ECF Nos. 32, 57)”

Straker v. Stancil
1:20-cv-03478-WJM-STV · 2022-03-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The Recommendation (ECF No. 84) is ADOPTED in its entirety; ... Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED; ... Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE”

InfoCision Management Corporation v. Griswold
1:20-cv-00357-WJM-KAS · 2022-08-04
Motion to alter or amend judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Court's Judgment. (ECF No. 49.)”

Zipris v. Ollada
1:22-cv-01402-WJM-SKC · 2024-07-31
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“In sum, because Zipris has not shown that there was an intervening change in the law, newly discovered evidence, or the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice, his Motion (ECF No. 70) is DENIED.”

Semple v. Williams
1:17-cv-01007-WJM · 2018-02-14
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Colorado's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) is DENIED;”

Peterson v. Pickering
1:22-cv-00320-WJM-KAS · 2024-03-14
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff Neil Peterson's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Strike Defendant's Counterclaims (ECF No. 161) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth above; ... Defendant's second and third counterclaims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE”

AECOM Technical Services, Inc. v. Flatiron | AECOM, LLC
1:19-cv-02811-WJM-KAS · 2024-01-03
Daubert motion (defendant) Granted in part

“The Buchanan Motion (ECF No. 290) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth above;”

Daubert motion (defendant) Granted in part

“The Kalayjian Motion (ECF No. 291) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth above; and”

Box Elder Kids, LLC v. Anadarko E & P Onshore, LLC
1:20-cv-02352-WJM-TPO · 2024-08-27
Daubert motion (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs' motion to exclude expert testimony from Jamie Jost. (ECF No. 195.)”

State of Colorado v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1:20-cv-01461-WJM-NRN · 2020-06-19
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“Colorado's Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 24), construed as a motion for stay of agency action under 5 U.S.C. Section 705, is GRANTED;”

Ziankovich v. Members of the Colorado Supreme Court
1:20-cv-00158-WJM-SKC · 2020-05-27
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff Ziankovich's Second Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion For Reconsider The Previous Order is DENIED.”

Johnson v. Kelly
1:20-cv-02373-WJM-MEH · 2023-08-14
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“the Court ORDERS that the Motions (ECF Nos. 53 and 56) are DENIED. This action remains CLOSED.”

Mueller v. Swift
1:15-cv-01974-WJM-KLM · 2017-07-25
Daubert motion (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Expert Report, Opinions, and Testimony of Jeffrey B. Opp (ECF No. 135) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED IN PART, as described herein.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Small, non-representative sample. A representative civil-duration distribution would require a broader terminated-civil sample.

Put Judge Martínez's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Martínez actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Martínez's own signed orders and cites them.