Richard Brooke Jackson
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 28) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART.”
“Defendant's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 30, is GRANTED. ... The Court enters summary judgment dismissing all of plaintiff's claims.”
“Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 31, is DENIED.”
“Farmers' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 23, is DENIED.”
“Lardyn and Ms. York's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 35, is DENIED.”
“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 59) is GRANTED.”
“Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 41) is denied as moot.”
“Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment, ECF No. 50, is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is granted as to plaintiff’s claims against the individual defendants in their official capacities and as to plaintiff’s claims against the Sheriff’s Office. Those claims are dismissed with prejudice. It is denied as to plaintiff’s claims against the individual defendants in their individual capacities and as to defendants’ alternative motion for summary judgment.”
“The motion to dismiss of defendants Roberts and Humphrey, ECF No. 41, is granted. The claims against them are dismissed with prejudice.”
“Defendants’ motion, ECF No. 40, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The Court dismisses plaintiffs’ Section 1983 excessive force claim against defendant Powers. 2. The Court dismisses the false arrest state law claim against the Board with prejudice. 3. The Court dismisses the state law claims against the individual defendants without prejudice.”
“Colorado Springs’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 68) is GRANTED.”
“Teller County’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 69) is GRANTED.”
“The individual CSPD defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 70) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”
“The added defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 65) is GRANTED.”
“The town defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 64) is GRANTED.”
“For the reasons above defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 57, is DENIED.”
“The pending motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 111, 112, and 113, are DENIED.”
“The motion to dismiss filed by defendants Thomas and Clark (ECF No. 37) is DENIED.”
“The motion to dismiss filed by defendant City of Arvada (ECF No. 39), and joined by defendant Valdez (ECF No. 41), is DENIED.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Small, non-representative sample. A representative civil-duration distribution would require a broader terminated-civil sample.
Put Judge Jackson's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Jackson actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Jackson's own signed orders and cites them.