Lewis Thornton Babcock
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [ECF No. 47] is GRANTED; ... Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendant University of Colorado on Plaintiff's claims for Title IX retaliation ... and violation of Title II of the ADA; and ... in favor of Defendant Leslie Lange on Plaintiff's claim for [the] Section 1983 claim for First Amendment retaliation”
“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's four retaliation claims [Doc #8] is DENIED AS MOOT; ... Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's constructive discharge claim is DENIED”
“Defendant's request for a more definite statement is GRANTED; and ... Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 14 days that substantially conforms to the guidelines described above.”
“The Plan's Partial Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [Doc #19] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a) The portion ... seeking dismissal of Plaintiff's Second Claim for Relief is DENIED; b) ... Fifth Claim for Relief is GRANTED and ... DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and c) ... Fourth Claim for Relief is GRANTED and ... DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“RCI's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc #25] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a) The portion ... regarding Plaintiff's Third Claim for Relief is DENIED; and b) The portion ... regarding Plaintiff's Sixth Claim for Relief is GRANTED and the Sixth Claim for Relief is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”
“I conclude that Mr. Ramirez’s claim for relief is within the scope of the appellate waiver he knowingly and voluntarily agreed to when he pleaded guilty. I further conclude that enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. I accordingly DENY the petition. (ECF No. 54.)”
“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss USAA Casualty Insurance Company and Garrison Property and Casualty Association [Doc. # 22] is GRANTED. Mr. Slavin’s claims against USAA Casualty Insurance Company and Garrison Property and Casualty Association are DISMISSED.”
“For the foregoing reasons, Allstate’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 51] is DENIED.”
“ORDERED that the Letter (ECF No. 5), which the Court has construed liberally as a request for preliminary injunctive relief, is DENIED without prejudice.”
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand to the District Court for Jefferson County Colorado [Doc #32 ] is DENIED.”
“ORDERED that the “Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order Pursuant to C.R.Civ.P. 65” (ECF No. 8) is DENIED.”
“ORDERED that the habeas corpus application is denied and the action is dismissed for lack of statutory jurisdiction because Applicant fails to demonstrate that the remedy available to him in the sentencing court is inadequate or ineffective.”
“For the reasons described above, I DENY Western Distributing’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23).”
“For the reasons described below, I GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Mr. Sanchez’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Sanchez’s Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 70.)”
“I GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Adams’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Adams’s Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 71.)”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Durations shown are short pro-se screening terminations (days to weeks), which reflect his senior-judge screening role, not contested-merits case length. The counseled Szeto merits case (filed 2022-06-27) was still pending at last review. This is not a representative merits-duration distribution; a counseled terminated-civil sample would be needed before reading it as one.
Put Judge Babcock's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Babcock actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Babcock's own signed orders and cites them.