Michael E. Romero

How Judge Romero rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Signed orders read
20

About Judge Romero

Michael E. Romero is a United States bankruptcy judge for the District of Colorado. His published judicial decisions date back to 2004.

Judge Romero's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Romero, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Motions

For expedited relief outside the first 20 days of a Chapter 11 case, alert chambers as soon as possible and be ready with a realistic hearing date and time estimate.

“please contact Chambers at 720-904-7413 as soon as possible to alert the Court of the need for any expedited relief”

Discovery

Except for protective-order motions, written discovery motions are denied; use the procedure in Local Bankruptcy Rule 7026-1(d).

“written discovery motions will be denied and parties will be required to follow the procedure set forth in the Rule”

Conferences

Monday Chapter 13 confirmation hearings are held by telephone only.

“All Monday confirmation hearings are now held by telephone only.”

Conferences

A settlement does not vacate a hearing unless the parties file a stipulation by the preceding day or at least one party appears and states the agreement on the record.

“hearings will be vacated only upon (1) receipt of a stipulation or agreement of the parties filed no later than the day before the scheduled hearing, or (2) appearance by at least one of the parties at the hearing”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Romero decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

For relief from stay, inaccurate schedules, unauthorized payments, and improper cash-collateral use supplied additional cause beyond the property's financial condition.

“the Court finds additional ‘cause’ to lift the automatic stay based on the Debtor's post-petition conduct”

A creditor seeking more time to investigate dischargeability showed cause through diligence even without completing every possible discovery step.

“this Court concludes that CBT has acted diligently, and in so doing, satisfied its burden to establish cause for the requested extension.”

Procedural preferences

Where statutory language sets a firm small-business plan deadline, general equitable and rule-based enlargement powers do not override it.

“The language of 11 U.S.C. § 1121(e) is clear and plain”

Cautions

A proposed financing arrangement must satisfy the Bankruptcy Code's substantive protections even if managerial authority is disputed.

“the proposed Motion to Borrow may not be approved on substantive grounds”

Bankruptcy does not enlarge an expired contractual purchase option when the statutory extension does not apply to the act required to exercise it.

“The Court is not willing, or able, to re-write the terms of the Repurchase Agreement to give the Debtor greater rights under that document than it would have if it had not filed for bankruptcy.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Nolan v. Smith (In re Smith)
· 2012-03-25
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Granted

“grants the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment based on the following discussion.”

Wadsworth v. Viveros (In re Viveros)
· 2011-06-07
Motion to compel turnover (Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“Trustee’s Motion to Compel Turnover of Property of the Estate is DENIED with respect to the Lexus.”

Motion to compel turnover (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“Trustee’s Motion to Compel Turnover of Property of the Estate is GRANTED with respect to the Audi and the Debtor shall immediately turn over to the Trustee the Audi or the $245 in equity.”

In re DB Capital Holdings, LLC
· 2011-05-25
Motion to approve postpetition financing (debtors) Denied

“the Court finds the proposed Motion to Borrow may not be approved on substantive grounds”

Brown v. Sallie Mae, Inc. (In re Brown)
· 2010-09-23
Student loan nondischargeability claim (debtor-plaintiff) Denied

“the Consolidation Loan owed to ECMC is nondischargeable, and judgment shall enter in favor of ECMC and against Brown.”

In re Wing
· 2010-09-09
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted

“the Debtors’ request for confirmation of their Chapter 13 plan is DENIED.”

In re 7677 East Berry Avenue Associates, L.P.
· 2009-11-19
Application to employ counsel (debtors in possession) Granted

“filed by each of the three jointly administered Debtors is GRANTED.”

Weinman v. Adam (In re Adam Aircraft Industries, Inc.)
· 2009-06-22
Motion for protective order (defendant) Granted

“the Motion for Protective Order Re: Written Discovery of Medical Information filed by the Defendant is GRANTED.”

In re Sweet
· 2007-05-21
Objection to proof of claim (debtors) Granted in part

“Pollack’s allowed claim in this case is determined to be $282,064.70”

Wilson v. United States (In re Wilson)
· 2008-07-30
Summary judgment (debtor-plaintiff) Granted in part

“Wilson’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, as conceded by the IRS, for tax years 1988, 1989,1990,1991, and 1993.”

Summary judgment (Internal Revenue Service) Granted in part

“the IRS’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to tax years 1994 through 2003”

In re Arrigo
· 2008-12-04
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Denied

“the Trustee’s Objection to confirmation of the Debtors’ Second Amended Plan dated August 28, 2008, is DENIED.”

Plan confirmation (debtors) Granted

“confirmation of the Debtor’s Second Amended Plan dated August 28, 2008, is GRANTED”

In re Ernst & Young, Inc.
· 2008-02-08
Petition for recognition of foreign main proceeding (foreign representative) Granted

“the Receivership Proceeding is hereby recognized as a foreign main proceeding”

In re William L. Saber, MD, PC
· 2007-04-26
Motion for relief from patient care ombudsman requirement (debtor) Granted

“the Debtor’s Motion for Relief from the Requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 333 that a Patient Care Ombudsman be Appointed is GRANTED.”

Draft for Judge Romero with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Romero, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Romero's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace