Mitchell D. Dembin

How Judge Dembin rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Dembin no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Position
Magistrate judge
Status
Left this court 2023
Education
Brooklyn College, City University of New York, B.A.; Western New England College School of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
24

About Judge Dembin

Mitchell D. Dembin served as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of California from 2011 until his retirement in April 2023. He earned degrees from Brooklyn College and Western New England College School of Law and previously served as an assistant United States attorney.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hammler v. Hernandez
3:18-cv-00259-CAB-MDD · 2019-07-05
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“On June 3, 2019, Magistrate Judge Dembin issued a Report and Recommendation to grant the motion to dismiss (‘Report re FAC’). ... the Court hereby (1) ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Dembin's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 32]; and (2) GRANTS the motion to dismiss the failure to protect claim in the FAC [Doc. No. 28].”

Dorsey v. Shakiba
3:20-cv-00843-JAH-MDD · 2023-02-27
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“On January 23, 2023, Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin submitted a Report and Recommendation (the ‘Report’) to this Court, recommending that Defendant's motion for summary judgement be granted. ... Defendants' motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 22), is GRANTED.”

Kelly v. Hickman
3:21-cv-01226-BEN-MDD · 2021-12-07
Motion for assignment order (plaintiff) Granted in part

“recommending that this Court partially grant Plaintiff's motion for assignment order and order restraining judgment debtor. ... The Court GRANTS the Motion with respect to Defendant's 2020 tax returns and DENIES the Motion with respect to stimulus checks received by Defendant.”

Sweetwood v. United States of America (McHaffie counterclaim)
10cv2189-W (MDD) · 2012-04-02
Motion for sanctions (counter-claimant United States) Granted

“the Court accepts Judge Dembin's recommendation, and ADOPTS the Report (Doc. 40) in its entirety... the Court GRANTS the motion for sanctions (Doc. 36) and ORDERS that default judgment be entered against Counter Defendant Charles R. McHaffie.”

Maldonado v. Stainer
11cv2768 DMS (MDD) · 2013-02-04
Habeas corpus 2254 (petitioner) Denied

“This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R, adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in full and DENIES the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.”

Fletcher v. Correctional Officer Marquez, et al.
16-CV-564 JLS (MDD) · 2018-03-12
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“the Court (1) OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objections, (2) ADOPTS Judge Dembin's R&R in its entirety, and (3) GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 15).”

In re: Midland Credit Management, Inc. Telephone Consumer Protection Litigation (Linko member case)
11md2286-MMA (MDD) · 2019-02-21
Motion for order to show cause (defendants) Granted in part

“the Court finds that Judge Dembin issued an accurate report and well-reasoned recommendation that the 26 cases in which Plaintiffs did not complete and serve discovery questionnaires or respond to the Court’s order to show cause be dismissed with prejudice. The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety and GRANTS IN PART Defendants’ motion for order to show cause why the cases in which Plaintiffs failed to timely respond to the discovery questionnaire should not be dismissed.”

T&S Enterprises, LLC v. Sumitomo Corporation of America, et al.
11cv1318-GPC (MDD) · 2012-10-10
Motions to compel (defendants) Granted in part

“Defendants' motion to compel production of the chronology reviewed by Mr. Toneys in advance of his deposition on August 14, 2012, is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff must produce the chronology to Defendants within 14 days... Plaintiff may redact the information contained in the ‘key’ field and in the ‘Notes’ field.”

Shapiro v. City of Carlsbad, et al.
11cv1080 CAB (MDD) · 2012-04-19
Motions to compel (defendants) Granted in part

“the motion to compel complete disclosures under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a) is GRANTED. The motion to preclude from admission documents not produced under Rule 26(a)(ii) is DENIED without prejudice. The motion to compel an independent medical examination is DENIED.”

Weese v. Beard
15cv1625-AJB (MDD) · 2015-08-06
Motion to substitute party (court (sua sponte)) Moot / procedural

“the Court hereby sua sponte ORDERS the substitution of Jeffrey Beard, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, as Respondent in place of Warden Cynthia Y. Tampkins.”

Pulley v. Paramo
14-CV-2034 JLS (MDD) · 2016-11-14
Habeas corpus 2254 (petitioner) Denied

“the Court (1) OVERRULES Petitioner's Objections, (2) ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety, and (3) DENIES Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.”

Valentino v. Sullivan
12cv917-LAB (MDD) · 2012-09-17
Motion for appointment of counsel (petitioner) Denied

“The Court finds that there is insufficient evidence that Petitioner may be incompetent and finds that appointment of counsel is not necessary to prevent a violation of due process. Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED without prejudice.”

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Dembin no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.