James Edward Simmons Jr.

“the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss Defendant PharmaCare Laboratories for lack of personal jurisdiction and DENIES the request for jurisdictional discovery. Defendant PharmaCare Laboratories is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

“the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss each cause of action with leave to amend. Plaintiff has 21 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint to address the deficiencies noted above.”

“the Court DISMISSES the first amended complaint in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court also GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 27. Plaintiffs will have one final opportunity to amend their complaint without claims asserted against diversity-destroying defendants”

“the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 16), and REMANDS this case to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego”

“the Court DENIES Richman's Motion to Transfer or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7), as moot.”

“This Court hereby approves the proposed Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement and finds that the proposed Settlement is, in all respects, fair, adequate and reasonable.”

“After due consideration and for the reasons discussed above, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. ... Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the Second Amended Complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend. The Clerk is directed to close this case.”

“Having reviewed the Parties' submissions and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close the case.”

“For the reasons above, the Court DENIES Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration.”

“ORDER: 1) DENYING THIRD AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF No. 13); 2) DENYING MOTIONS FOR ENLARGEMENT OF THE RECORD (ECF No. 47) JUDICIAL NOTICE (ECF No. 51), JOINDER (ECF Nos. 53, 54, 58), and SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 55, 57); and 3) DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY”

“ORDER DENYING FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND GRANTING A LIMITED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY”

“After considering the parties' submissions, the administrative record, and the applicable law, for the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14), REVERSES the Commissioner's decision, and REMANDS the matter to the Commissioner for further administrative action consistent with the findings presented herein.”

“The Court has reviewed the Petition, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, the relevant documents filed in this case, and the legal arguments presented. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and DENIES a certificate of appealability.”