Hannah L. Blumenstiel

How Judge Blumenstiel rules, drawn from 12 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
February 11, 2013
Education
The Ohio State University, B.A., 1992; Capital University Law School, J.D., 1997
Signed orders read
12

About Judge Blumenstiel

Hannah L. Blumenstiel has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of California since February 2013. Before joining the bench, she practiced bankruptcy litigation and clerked for a bankruptcy judge in the Southern District of Ohio. She earned degrees from The Ohio State University and Capital University Law School.

Judge Blumenstiel's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Blumenstiel, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Do not send chambers copies to Judge Blumenstiel.

“Judge Blumenstiel does not want chambers copies of any pleading or other document filed with the Court. Please do not send chambers copies.”

Motions

Include the motion and supporting memorandum with an application to shorten time.

“Such Applications must comply with B.L.R. 9006-1 and Rule 9006(c) and must include a copy of the motion and supporting memorandum of points and authorities”

Discovery

After meeting and conferring, email a discovery dispute letter of no more than five pages to the courtroom deputy instead of filing a discovery motion.

“the parties should not file discovery motions. Rather, the aggrieved party should submit a letter brief of no more than five (5) pages to the Court via email”

Conferences

Judge Blumenstiel holds hearings by Zoom; notices must include the required remote hearing language.

“Judge Blumenstiel conducts all hearings via Zoom. All Notices of Hearings must include the remote hearing language required by SF Noticing Procedures,”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Blumenstiel decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Fraud-based nondischargeability turns on proof of each debtor's own knowledge or on a grounded basis to impute an agent's fraud.

“It is only where a debtor learns of facts that require investigation into the agent's conduct but fails to undertake such an inquiry that a court can find that the debtor ‘should have known’ of the agent's fraud”

Cautions

A creditor must distinguish intentional deception from conduct that caused loss without an intent to injure.

“This evidence does not, however, establish that Mr. Carroll actually intended for Mr. Jadallah never to be repaid”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Tradex Global Master Fund SPC, Ltd. v. Chui (In re Chui)
· 2015-09-24
Nondischargeability claim fiduciary defalcation (plaintiffs) Denied

“Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden of establishing nondis-chargeability under sections 528(a)(4) and 528(a)(19).”

Nondischargeability claim securities violation (plaintiffs) Denied

“Having ruled in favor of the Defendant on both causes of action, the Court will enter judgment in favor of Defendant.”

Buckley v. Bartenwerfer (In re Bartenwerfer)
· 2016-04-01
Nondischargeability adversary claim (creditor) Granted

“the Court finds that Mr. Buckley has satisfied his burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the Bartenwerfers’s debt to Mr. Buckley with respect to the non-disclosure of water leaks, window conditions, permits, and the fire escape is nondis-chargeable”

Jadallah v. Carroll (In re Carroll)
· 2016-04-14
Nondischargeability claim fraud (creditor) Granted in part

“Mr. Jadallah has met his burden of establishing that Mr. Carroll’s liability for fraud related to the March 7, May 14, May 28, and August 9 advances is nondis-chargeable under section 523(a)(2)(A).”

Nondischargeability claim willful injury (creditor) Denied

“has failed to establish nondisehargeability as to any of the advances under section 523(a)(6).”

Buckley v. Bartenwerfer (In re Bartenwerfer)
· 2019-01-04
Nondischargeability adversary claim on remand (creditor) Denied

“the court will render judgment on Mr. Buckley's complaint in favor of Mrs. Bartenwerfer.”

In re Paxton
· 2019-01-29
Motion for automatic stay contempt (debtors) Granted in part

“Mr. and Mrs. Paxton's Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

In re Heller Ehrman LLP
08-32514 · 2020-03-02
Objection to proof of claim (debtor) Granted

“against Heller and the Claim is hereby DISALLOWED.”

Buckley v. Bartenwerfer (In re Bartenwerfer)
13-03185 · 2019-07-01
Request for nondischargeable attorneys fees (creditor plaintiff) Granted

“shall be allowed non-dischargeable attorneys’ fees in the amount”

Gerevich v. Sun (In re Gerevich)
14-03056 · 2015-10-19
Objection to proof of claim (debtor tenants) Granted in part

“Accordingly, Defendants’ claim will be allowed in the amount of”

TRICO Pipes v. Wong (In re Wong)
16-03002 · 2017-06-05
Nondischargeability adversary claim (creditor plaintiffs) Denied

“favor on all claims raised by TRICO Pipes and Mr. Hodess and”

Heatley v. Hujazi (In re Hujazi)
16-03027 · 2017-05-31
Nondischargeability adversary claim (creditor plaintiff) Denied

“Hujazi on all counts asserted in Mr. Heatley’s complaint.”

Ng v. Tom (In re Tom)
19-03065 · 2022-07-29
Motion for summary adjudication (creditor plaintiffs) Granted

“The Motion is hereby GRANTED;”

Request for judicial notice (creditor plaintiffs) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ Request for Judicial Notice is hereby 16 GRANTED;”

Turlington v. Grover (In re Grover)
16-05083 · 2018-04-25
Nondischargeability adversary claim (creditor plaintiff) Denied

“Turlington and in favor of Mr. Grover on the claims for relief”

Draft for Judge Blumenstiel with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Blumenstiel, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Blumenstiel's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace