Dennis Montali

How Judge Montali rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
April 23, 1993
Education
University of Notre Dame, B.A., 1961; University of California, Berkeley, J.D., 1968
Signed orders read
18

About Judge Montali

Dennis Montali has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of California since April 1993. He served on the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel from 2000 through 2010 and was its chief judge in 2009 and 2010. He earned degrees from the University of Notre Dame and the University of California, Berkeley.

Judge Montali's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Montali, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Convert proposed orders directly to PDF without scanning.

“Uploaded orders should be converted to PDF electronically, not scanned.”

Motions

A request to shorten time must be written and supported by a declaration describing efforts to obtain the opposing party’s consent.

“The party should make the request in writing and submit a declaration describing the efforts made to obtain the consent of the opposing party to the order shortening time.”

Motions

Give opposing parties at least 72 hours’ notice and service of moving papers for a temporary restraining order.

“Moving parties should give at least 72 hours’ notice to, and service of moving papers upon, opposing parties.”

Motions

Obtain a clerk’s default before seeking default judgment in an adversary proceeding.

“A clerk’s default must be obtained first.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Montali decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He expects an expert report to disclose the actual reasoning connecting facts to an opinion, not merely the ultimate conclusion.

“the report should offer the ‘how and why’ of the results, not mere conclusions.”

In discharge litigation, a credible factual explanation can satisfy the debtor's burden even when the underlying recordkeeping practice was poor.

“The court does accept that explanation, not because it condones the practice but because it is credible and has not been rebutted.”

Cautions

A party seeking bankruptcy relief while withholding adequate protection risks losing stay protection even if it preserves separate merits objections.

“If you want to gamble in the casino and hope to hit the jackpot, you can’t expect to win by using house money.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Hages
· 2000-09-05
Trustee fee application (former Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“Schoenmann is entitled to a chapter 13 administrative claim of $1,530.”

Ontiveros v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Ontiveros)
· 2001-08-31
Motion to abstain (United States) Granted

“the motion to abstain is granted and this adversary proceeding is dismissed.”

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. California Public Utilities Commission (In re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.)
· 2001-06-01
Application for preliminary injunction (debtor) Denied

“E’s Preliminary Injunction Application will be denied”

Motions to dismiss (state commission) Granted

“the Motion To Dismiss will be granted”

Summary judgment (debtor) Moot / procedural

“the Motion For Summary Judgment will be denied as moot.”

Raima UK Ltd. v. Centura Software Corp. (In re Centura Software Corp.)
· 2002-07-24
Motion to preserve license rights (licensee) Granted

“the court will grant the 365(n) Motion”

Motion for partial summary judgment on setoff (licensee) Denied

“and deny the Setoff Rights Motion.”

In re Central European Industrial Development Co. LLC
· 2003-01-02
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (creditor) Granted

“the court will grant the Motion To Dismiss”

Motion for reconsideration (debtors) Denied

“and deny the Motion For Reconsideration.”

Showplace Square Loft Co. v. Primecore Mortgage Trust, Inc. (In re Showplace Square Loft Co.)
· 2003-02-06
Summary judgment (mechanic's-lien claimant) Granted in part

“the court will grant summary judgment in part and deny summary judgment in part.”

Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Dayton (In re Dayton)
· 2004-02-24
Motion for attorneys fees (debtor) Granted

“the court is awarding debtor attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,585.00.”

Star's Edge, Inc. v. Braun (In re Braun)
· 2005-07-27
Summary judgment (copyright holders) Granted

“GRANTED. The debts for copyright infringement, libel per se, and sanctions, attorney fees and costs are nondischargeable under section 523(a)(6).”

In re Central European Industrial Development Company, LLC
· 2006-11-27
Motion for compensatory contempt damages (creditor Lehman Brothers) Granted in part

“awarding it compensatory contempt damages consisting of fees of $3,067,938.86 and expenses of $129,952.16 for a total award of $3,197,891.02”

In re Kimmel
· 2007-04-11
Motions to remand (creditor) Denied

“the court will deny Rooz’s oral motion for remand”

Judgment on the pleadings (debtor) Granted

“grant Roberta’s motion for judgment on the pleadings”

Motion to reopen and enforce discharge injunction (nondebtor spouse) Denied

“deny without prejudice David’s combined motion to reopen his case and enforce the discharge injunction.”

In re Lockwood
· 2008-11-17
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“the court will grant summary judgment in favor of Michele and Silver Eagle with respect to certain breach of contract claims in the first count and to the contractual interference claims in the third count, will grant summary judgment in favor of Lockwood on the second and third counts, and will deny the balance”

In re Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP
· 2009-02-23
Objection to proof of claim (case trustee) Granted in part

“the Case Trustee’s objection to the Plan Trustee’s claim against the estate for $4,416,786.73 is SUSTAINED, with a portion of the claim being allowed in the amount of $215,179.71.”

Draft for Judge Montali with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Montali, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Montali's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace