Raymond Charles Clevenger III

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit circuit Appointed by George H. W. Bush (Republican) 26 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Michael D. Moehl v. United States
60 F.3d 839 · 1995-04-06
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“We reverse and remand the case for further proceedings.”

James M. Henry, Sr. v. Polish America, Inc.
57 F.3d 1085 · 1995-06-13
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Consequently, the judgment of the district court enjoining the individual defendants and mandating monetary payment from the corporate defendants is reversed.”

Steffens v. Brown
60 F.3d 843 · 1995-07-07
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The CVA's denial of Steffens's petition for relief is reversed, and the case is remanded for prompt attention from the CVA.”

Schuler Industries, Inc. v. United States
109 F.3d 753 · 1997-03-24
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The decision of the Court of Federal Claims is therefore affirmed.”

Barrera v. Gober
122 F.3d 1030 · 1997-08-08
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The law as stated in Grantham controls the outcome of these two cases and requires summary reversal in these two cases.”

Bradford Industries, Inc. v. United States
152 F.3d 1339 · 1998-08-07
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We also agree, and we therefore affirm.”

Freeland v. HPA Asset, LLC
· 2002-04-24
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“For the above reasons, we reverse and remand this case for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

Levi Strauss & Co. v. United States
222 F.3d 1344 · 2000-07-27
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The Court of International Trade's judgment to the contrary is accordingly reversed, and we remand the case with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the United States.”

Belcher v. West
214 F.3d 1335 · 2000-08-21
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, Mr. Belcher's appeal is dismissed.”

Gregory v. United States Postal Service
212 F.3d 1296 · 2000-05-15
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED-IN-PART, VACATED-IN-PART AND REMANDED”

Best v. Principi
30 F. App'x 944 · 2002-02-20
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“For the above reasons the appeal is not sufficiently final for the purposes of our review, as was the case in Williams, and is therefore dismissed.”

AccuScan, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.
76 F. App'x 290 · 2003-09-17
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“Based on the Supreme Court's instruction, we have reconsidered this case and, once again, reverse the denial of Xerox's motion for JMOL of noninfringement, affirm the denial of Xerox's motion for JMOL of invalidity, and dismiss as moot the remaining issues.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.

Put Judge Clevenger's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Clevenger actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Clevenger's own signed orders and cites them.