Leonard Philip Stark

How Judge Stark rules, drawn from 37 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Position
circuit
Appointed by
Joe Biden (Democratic)
Commissioned
2022-03-16
Education
University of Delaware (B.A., B.S., M.A., 1991); University of Oxford, Magdalen College (D.Phil. in politics, 1993; Rhodes Scholar); Yale Law School (J.D., 1996)
Signed orders read
37

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Thaler v. Vidal
2021-2347 · 2022-08-05
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Here, Congress has determined that only a natural person can be an inventor, so AI cannot be. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is affirmed.”

Sanderling Management Ltd. v. Snap Inc.
2021-2173 · 2023-04-12
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the district court's decision.”

Dionex Softron GmbH v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
2021-2372 · 2023-01-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the Board.”

United Cannabis Corp. v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc.
2022-1363 · 2023-05-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm.”

Plastipak Packaging, Inc. v. Premium Waters, Inc.
2021-2244 · 2022-12-19
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Therefore, we must reverse the District Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Premium Waters and remand to that Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

Mosaic Brands, Inc. v. Ridge Wallet LLC
2022-1001 · 2022-12-20
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“Hence, we affirm Ridge's non-infringement of Mosaic's '616 patent, reverse the grant of summary judgment of invalidity of Ridge's '808 patent, vacate the District Court's denial of summary judgment on Mosaic's inequitable conduct defense, affirm Ridge's non-infringement of Mosaic's purported trade dress, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Hanser v. McDonough
2021-1974 · 2022-12-21
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the Veterans Court's decision.”

In re Google LLC
2023-101 · 2023-02-01
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“The petition is granted. The district court's order denying Google's motion to transfer is vacated, and the district court is directed to grant the transfer motion.”

Grounds v. McDonough
2022-1607 · 2023-07-14
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Accordingly, the decision of the Veterans Court is affirmed.”

Nova Group/Tutor-Saliba v. United States
2022-1740 · 2023-12-11
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, then, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims.”

Avue Technologies Corp. v. Department of Health and Human Services
2022-1784 · 2024-03-06
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Thus, for the reasons stated above, we vacate the Board's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and remand for further proceedings on the merits consistent with this opinion.”

Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc.
2022-1387 · 2023-09-01
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We have considered Sisvel's other arguments and find them unpersuasive. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.

Draft for Judge Stark with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Stark, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Stark's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace