Jack Richard Miller

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit circuit Retired 1994 · served 1982–1994 Appointed by Richard Nixon (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Miller no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Miller decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

For product-by-process claims, he placed the evidentiary burden on applicants when the prior-art product appeared identical.

“Where a product-by-process claim is rejected over a prior art product that appears to be identical, although produced by a different process, the burden is upon the applicants to come forward with evidence establishing an unobvious difference between the claimed product and the prior art product.”

Cautions

He treated the deadline for establishing appellate jurisdiction as strict and mandatory.

“By relying on date of receipt by his union representative, the petitioner was able to meet his burden of proving jurisdiction — a burden previously recognized as “strict” and “mandatory” by the Court of Claims.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In Re Teledyne Industries, Inc. D/b/a, Teledyne Water Pik
· 1982-12-29
Petition for review (Teledyne Industries, Inc.) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Shaw Industries, Inc., Mohasco Corporation, Queen Carpet Corporation, and Tice Yarns v. The United States
· 1983-05-27
Appeal (Shaw Industries, Inc. and the other appellants) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Cbs Inc. v. George Clifford Morrow
· 1983-06-06
Petition for review (CBS Inc.) Granted

“REVERSED.”

General Motors Corporation v. The United States
· 1983-06-15
Appeal (General Motors Corporation) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.”

In Re Laszlo Marosi, Joachim Stabenow, and Matthias Schwarzmann
· 1983-06-22
Petition for review (Laszlo Marosi, Joachim Stabenow, and Matthias Schwarzmann) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED-IN-PART; REVERSED-IN-PART.”

A.B. Dick Company v. Burroughs Corporation
· 1983-07-27
Appeal (A.B. Dick Company) Granted

“REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

In Re Bruce Charles Farrenkopf and Magdalena Usategui-Gomez, and Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Intervenor
· 1983-07-27
Petition for review (Bruce Charles Farrenkopf and Magdalena Usategui-Gomez) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Gerald P. Gragg v. The United States
· 1983-09-15
Petition for review (Gerald P. Gragg) Moot / procedural

“DISMISSED.”

Capital Electric Company v. The United States
· 1984-02-07
Appeal (Capital Electric Company) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.”

August Urbanek and Estate of Irene Urbanek, Deceased, August Urbanek, Personal Representative v. The United States
· 1984-04-06
Appeal (August Urbanek and the Estate of Irene Urbanek) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Devine v. Brisco
· 1984-04-27
Petition for review (Donald J. Devine, Director of the Office of Personnel Management) Granted

“REVERSED.”

In Re Lucas S. Gordon and Karl M. Sutherland
· 1984-05-10
Petition for review (Lucas S. Gordon and Karl M. Sutherland) Granted

“REVERSED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Not applicable to this circuit-court record.

A historical record

Judge Miller no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.