Work with this judge in Ezel
Draft and get answers grounded in how Judge Mayer actually rules, cited to their own orders.
Draft a motion
Ask about Judge Mayer
Quick facts
Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Position circuit
Appointed by Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned 1987-06-15
Education United States Military Academy (B.S., 1963); William & Mary Law School (J.D., 1971)
Signed orders read 40
Last updated 2026-07-10
Motion outcomes
AppealN = 35
counts only
16 3 14 2
Petition for reviewN = 5
counts only
1 4
Counted from classified signed orders. A “1 of 1” is one ruling, not a tendency.
About this data
A free Ezel research resource. This profile is built from public records: the judge's own signed orders, public docket records, and published biographies. It is not legal advice and is not affiliated with the court.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
Martinez v. United States
914 F.2d 1486 · 1990-09-24
Appeal (appellant)
Denied
“Accordingly, the judgment of the Claims Court is affirmed.”
Hills Materials Co. v. Rice
982 F.2d 514 · 1992-12-29
Appeal (appellant)
Granted
“Accordingly, the decision of the board is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
American Satellite Co. v. United States
998 F.2d 950 · 1993-10-27
Appeal (appellant)
Granted in part
“Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims is reversed in-part and vacated in-part, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Mintzmyer v. Department of the Interior
84 F.3d 419 · 1996-05-16
Petition for review (petitioner)
Denied
“Accordingly, the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board is affirmed.”
Statistica, Inc. v. Christopher
102 F.3d 1577 · 1996-12-19
Appeal (appellant)
Denied
“Accordingly, the decision of the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals is affirmed.”
New Zealand Lamb Co. v. United States
149 F.3d 1366 · 1998-07-20
Appeal (appellant)
Granted
“Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of International Trade is reversed.”
Caldera v. J.S. Alberici Construction Co.
153 F.3d 1381 · 1998-12-01
Appeal (appellant)
Denied
“Accordingly, the decision of the Army Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals’ judgment is affirmed.”
Connaught Laboratories, Inc. v. SmithKline Beecham P.L.C.
98-1471 · 1999-01-25
Appeal (appellant)
Moot / procedural
“Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”
Bell v. Office of Personnel Management
98-3240 · 1999-03-31
Petition for review (petitioner)
Granted
“Accordingly, the decision of the board is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Diversey Lever, Inc. v. Ecolab, Inc.
191 F.3d 1350 · 1999-10-20
Appeal (appellant)
Denied
“Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan is affirmed.”
Camargo Correa Metais, S.A. v. United States
99-1191, -1192 · 1999-12-21
Appeal (appellant)
Granted
“Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of International Trade is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell Inc.
00-1241 · 2001-02-05
Appeal (appellant)
Granted in part
“we affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, vacate-in-part, and remand.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.
Put Judge Mayer's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Mayer actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Draft a motion tuned to how Judge Mayer rules
Ask Ezel about Judge Mayer
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Mayer's own signed orders and cites them.