Daniel Mortimer Friedman

How Judge Friedman rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Friedman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
Retired 1989
Served
1982–1989
Appointed by
Jimmy Carter (Democratic)
Commissioned
1982-10-01
Education
Columbia University (A.B., 1937); Columbia Law School (LL.B., 1940)
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Friedman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Friedman confined review to the rationale actually adopted by the agency rather than a new appellate theory.

“We decline to consider counsel’s newly-minted theory as an alternative ground for upholding the agency’s decision.”

He enforced contractual cost limits when the record showed neither inducement nor waiver by the government.

“The Board correctly held that the government had not waived the cost provision.”

Procedural preferences

Friedman required a nonfrivolous factual dispute before ordering an evidentiary hearing on administrative jurisdiction.

“Pervez has not raised any ‘non-frivolous issues of fact relating to jurisdiction’ that require a hearing for their resolution.”

He remanded when an administrative opinion did not adequately disclose the rationale needed for judicial review.

“In short, we cannot approve the Board’s decision on the basis of its opinion.”

Cautions

Friedman disfavored attempts to revive a dismissed case through a legal theory that could have been raised earlier.

“They do not point to any newly discovered evidence or new legal developments.”

He treated statutory eligibility deadlines for federal payments as binding on both agencies and courts.

“Neither courts nor administrative agencies, however, have the authority to waive requirements (including filing deadlines) that Congress has imposed as a condition to the payment of federal money.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Degussa Canada Ltd. v. United States
· 1996-06-24
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Hess v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
· 1997-02-18
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Advanced Materials, Inc. v. Perry
· 1997-02-24
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

In re Robertson
· 1999-02-25
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“REVERSED.”

United States v. D.L. Kaufman, Inc.
· 1999-04-19
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“The case is partially remanded to the district court, for that court to state:”

Marrazzo v. Office of Personnel Management
· 1999-05-12
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“VACATED AND REMANDED.”

Schoemakers v. Office of Personnel Management
· 1999-06-22
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Sebastian v. United States
· 1999-08-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Rodriguez v. West
· 1999-08-25
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Pervez v. Department of the Navy
· 1999-10-25
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Henderson v. Department of the Interior
· 2000-01-28
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Invamed Inc.
· 2000-05-23
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Not applicable to this circuit-court record.

A historical record

Judge Friedman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.