Work with this judge in Ezel
Draft and get answers grounded in how Judge Schall actually rules, cited to their own orders.
Draft a motion
Ask about Judge Schall
Quick facts
Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Position circuit
Appointed by George H. W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned 1992-08-17
Education Princeton University (B.A., 1966); Tulane University Law School (J.D., 1969)
Signed orders read 48
Last updated 2026-07-10
Motion outcomes
AppealN = 36
counts only
15 2 19
Petition for reviewN = 12
counts only
6 1 5
Counted from classified signed orders. A “1 of 1” is one ruling, not a tendency.
About this data
A free Ezel research resource. This profile is built from public records: the judge's own signed orders, public docket records, and published biographies. It is not legal advice and is not affiliated with the court.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
Para-Ordnance Manufacturing, Inc. v. SGS Importers International, Inc.
73 F.3d 1085 · 1996-03-20
Appeal (appellant)
Denied
“We affirm the court's determination of invalidity and do not address infringement.”
Collette v. Brown
82 F.3d 389 · 1996-04-23
Petition for review (claimant (petitioner))
Granted
“For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Court of Veterans Appeals affirming the BVA's denial of Collette's claim is vacated.”
Perez v. Merit Systems Protection Board
85 F.3d 591 · 1996-06-03
Petition for review (petitioner)
Denied
“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the decision of the Board dismissing Perez's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.”
Hutchison v. Merit Systems Protection Board
91 F.3d 1458 · 1996-08-07
Petition for review (petitioner)
Granted
“We vacate and remand.”
Arbor Foods Inc. v. United States
97 F.3d 534 · 1996-09-30
Appeal (appellant)
Denied
“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the Court of International Trade.”
Elliott v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
95 F.3d 1121 · 1996-11-21
Appeal (appellant)
Denied
“The decision of the district court affirming the RO is therefore affirmed.”
Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v. United States
116 F.3d 454 · 1997-06-18
Appeal (United States (appellant))
Granted
“For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims is vacated.”
Martinez v. Merit Systems Protection Board
126 F.3d 1480 · 1997-10-15
Petition for review (petitioner)
Denied
“For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Board is affirmed.”
Vectra Fitness, Inc. v. TNWK Corp.
162 F.3d 1379 · 1999-01-22
Appeal (appellant)
Denied
“For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.”
Tippett v. United States
185 F.3d 1250 · 1999-06-18
Appeal (appellant)
Granted
“Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the Court of Federal Claims and remand the case to the court for further proceedings.”
Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
182 F.3d 1356 · 1999-07-16
Appeal (defendant (appellant))
Granted
“The court's ultimate determination under 35 U.S.C. Sec. 285 is vacated and the case as a whole is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
La Crosse Footwear, Inc. v. United States
191 F.3d 1372 · 1999-09-14
Appeal (United States (appellant))
Granted
“For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims is reversed.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.
Put Judge Schall's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Schall actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Draft a motion tuned to how Judge Schall rules
Ask Ezel about Judge Schall
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Schall's own signed orders and cites them.