William B. Shubb

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 67) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff.”

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the County's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. Plaintiffs have thirty days from the date this Order is signed to file a First Amended Complaint, if they can do so consistent with this Order.”

“Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 34) is denied.”

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 46) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling after the stay is lifted.”

“Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED; The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 14, is DENIED; and ... The matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.”

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication (Docket No. 93-1) be, and the same thereby is, DENIED as to Sinclair's First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Sixth Claims for damages, Harper's First, Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, and Tenth Claims, as well as Plaintiffs' Fifth Claim ... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion ... is GRANTED as to Sinclair's First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Sixth Claims for statutory penalties, as well as Plaintiffs' Fifth Claim for violations of Cal. Labor Code 2751(b) and 223, and Eighth Claim for violations of Cal. Labor Code 432.”

“2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part; and 3. This action will proceed only on plaintiff's retaliation claim against defendant Mayfield; summary judgment is granted for all other defendants on all remaining claims.”

“2. Defendant Racklin's motion for summary judgment, filed January 28, 2019 (ECF No. 38), is GRANTED; ... 4. This case is CLOSED.”

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiff's Individual Claims, Dismiss the Putative Class Claims, and Stay the PAGA Claims (Docket No. 11) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.”

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion to strike plaintiffs' claim for injunctive and declaratory relief be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects defendant's motion to dismiss or strike be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.”

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss the Smart Complaint (Smart Docket No. 7) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED IN PART and GRANTED in PART. Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Smart Plaintiffs' claim for violations of the Sherman Act § 1 (Claim 1) and California's UCL as brought by Plaintiff Hacker under the unfair and unlawful prongs (Claim 4). Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to all other claims in the Smart Complaint.”

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss Counts One through Nine of the Indictment be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.”