Dena M. Coggins

How Judge Coggins rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Position
district
Appointed by
Joe Biden (Democratic)
Commissioned
2024-09-18
ABA rating
Well Qualified
Education
California State University, Sacramento (B.A., 2003); University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law (J.D., 2006)
Signed orders read
13

How Judge Coggins decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In repeated immigration-detention cases, treats objections that merely repeat previously rejected arguments as insufficient to displace a recommendation granting due-process relief.

“those arguments were addressed and rejected by the magistrate judge and the undersigned in this case and in other cases.”

In a residential-foreclosure dispute, granted temporary relief where the homeowner showed serious merits questions and the risk of losing a primary residence outweighed the short delay to the sale.

“the balance of the equities tips sharply in Plaintiff’s favor. Plaintiff faces the risk of losing his primary residence, while the issuance of a temporary restraining order would delay the foreclosure sale”

Cautions

Grants a defendant's motion for summary judgment and enters judgment for the defendant, closing the case.

“2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 57) is granted; 3. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants; and 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Plunkett v. Parham
2:19-cv-01450-DC-AC · 2024-12-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 57) is granted; 3. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants; and 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.”

Grayson v. Sacramento County Main Jail
2:23-cv-02859-DC-DMC · 2025-04-21

Sua sponte screening disposition under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A. The magistrate found cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive-force and First Amendment retaliation claims and recommended dismissing the remaining claims without leave to amend because no amended complaint had been filed. With no objections, Coggins adopted the recommendation after de novo review. The order states: '1. The findings and recommendations issued on January 28, 2025 (Doc. No. 14) are ADOPTED in full... 3. All other claims... and all other defendants... are dismissed.'

Gonzalez v. Smith
2:24-cv-00810-DC-AC · 2025-01-08
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“Respondent’s motion to dismiss Petitioner’s mixed petition (Doc. No. 13) is granted;”

Motions to stay (petitioner) Denied

“Petitioner’s motion for a stay and abeyance under Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005) (Doc. No. 20) is denied;”

Reif v. NewRez, LLC
2:25-cv-02963-DC-AC · 2025-10-15
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED1;”

Brown v. Singh
2:25-cv-01353-DC-JDP · 2025-10-15
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order, ECF No. 28, are DENIED;”

Dussan Pineda v. Chestnut
1:25-cv-01970-DC-JDP · 2026-01-05
Preliminary injunction (petitioner) Granted

“Petitioner Carolina Dussan Pineda’s motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 3) is GRANTED;”

Reyes Gaytan v. Knight
1:25-cv-02041-DC-JDP · 2026-03-10
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted

“The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED;”

Motions to dismiss (respondents) Denied

“Respondents’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 6, is DENIED;”

LNU v. Andrews
1:26-cv-00871-DC-CSK · 2026-03-18
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted

“The petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED;”

Motions to dismiss (respondent) Denied

“Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6) is DENIED;”

Ramirez Baten v. Warden
2:26-cv-01173-DC-CKD · 2026-04-02
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted in part

“Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) and motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 2) are GRANTED as follows:”

Motion for temporary restraining order (petitioner) Granted
Lopez v. Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility
1:26-cv-04409-DC-SCR · 2026-06-16
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted in part

“Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) and motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. No. 2) are GRANTED as follows:”

Motion for temporary restraining order (petitioner) Granted
Aguilar-Garcia v. Noem
1:26-cv-01395-DC-DMC · 2026-07-24
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted

“habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED;”

Motions to dismiss (respondents) Denied

“Respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is DENIED;”

Perez v. Parker
2:25-cv-02702-DC-CSK · 2026-07-28
In forma pauperis (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED as having been rendered moot by this order;”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Because Coggins joined the court in September 2024, her caseload is dominated by a June 2026 surge of immigration-detention habeas petitions, along with inherited prisoner civil-rights cases and general consumer or product disputes. Many merits dispositions so far have involved district-court action on magistrate-judge recommendations.

Draft for Judge Coggins with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Coggins, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Coggins's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace