Daniel J. Calabretta

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California district Appointed by Joe Biden (Democratic) 15 signed orders read

How Judge Calabretta decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Denies a petitioner's summary-judgment motion as moot once the petition itself is dismissed.

“4. Petitioner's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13) is denied as moot.”

Cautions

Grants a motion to dismiss and dismisses a habeas petition without prejudice as an unauthorized second or successive petition.

“2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is granted. 3. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without prejudice as an unauthorized second or successive petition.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Dingle v. Covello
2:22-cv-02098-DJC-CKD · 2023-05-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is granted. 3. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without prejudice as an unauthorized second or successive petition.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“4. Petitioner's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 13) is denied as moot.”

Snyder v. Shasta County Superior Court
2:22-cv-01140-DJC-DMC · 2023-09-29

In a pro se Section 2254 habeas matter, Calabretta adopted an unobjected magistrate judge's findings and recommendation, dismissed the action sua sponte and without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules, and declined a certificate of appealability. Grounding quote: '2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders.'

Cravotta v. County of Sacramento
2:22-cv-00167-DJC-AC · 2025-08-14
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Regents Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 127) is GRANTED”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 130) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Valley National Bank v. J H B Trucking Inc.
2:21-cv-01285-DJC-CKD · 2025-03-19
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36).”

Timmins v. Unilever United States, Inc.
2:24-cv-03017-DJC-JDP · 2025-06-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8).”

Cohen v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
2:25-cv-00770-DJC-CKD · 2025-07-03
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 7.) This case is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of Sacramento County.”

Mixon v. WellSpace Health
2:24-cv-02290-DJC-CSK · 2025-07-03
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED”

Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the U.S. Attorney's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 30) is DENIED as moot”

Singleton v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
2:25-cv-02030-DJC-AC · 2025-12-05
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs' motion to remand (ECF No.17) is DENIED”

Doe v. Becerra
2:25-cv-00647-DJC-DMC · 2025-10-20
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“the Petitioner's Motion to Amend Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 42) is DENIED.”

Sambuev v. Andrews
1:25-cv-01814-DJC-AC · 2026-01-06
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“A Preliminary Injunction shall issue on the same terms set forth in the Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 9).”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) is DENIED without prejudice to filing a properly noticed motion in accordance with the Local Rules.”

Unit 53 v. PACT Capital
2:25-cv-02591-DJC-CSK · 2025-10-15
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 7) is DENIED.”

Hedrington v. United States
2:24-cv-03541-DJC-JDP · 2026-02-24
Motion to declare vexatious litigant (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion to deem plaintiff vexatious, ECF No. 16, is GRANTED”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 15, is GRANTED”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Calabretta's Sacramento caseload includes a June 2026 surge of immigration-detention habeas petitions, a substantial criminal calendar, post-conviction motions arising from those criminal cases, prisoner civil-rights matters, and general consumer and product disputes. The durations below come from terminated cases.

Put Judge Calabretta's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Calabretta actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Calabretta's own signed orders and cites them.